/lit/ - Literature

Question for the philosophical pessimists/anti-natalists on this board.

If we achieve the objective of voluntary extinction what's to prevent abiogenesis from occuring again given that it happened once?

I'm not trying to use this as an objection, of course

>>20141170
You act as though you’re a corpse already.
Ah, but it’s more of a sick foreign goo oozing in your head. Poor thing.

>>17936317
>is there anything better?
Nothin’ better

>>17937871
Not Sovietism, anon. Communism.
You want the book recs?

>>17869890
Good enough to help us end banking, I hope. But it’s still accumulative and I don’t trust it.

>>17869896
Who? Not an argument.

>>17869897
Read the Cockshott book.

>>17869898
>Green supremacist
Cringy bitch

>>17869903
Before money, life was free. Ever read Ovid?

>>17412850
They’re children of capitalism. They expect you to make money.

>>16354335
> Where are you getting your moral standard from
Your mum

>>15665611
No. It’s my specialty. Why are you against peace and freedom?

Nonsense. And not even remotely lit related

>>14812720
It is MY abstract ideal. What have you read of Stirner, Kropotkin, Bookchin? This world I angle for is a world where we get back to a slower small town pace, no less advanced technologically, the effort to organize would mature us past this slave child world we have now. A cure for much though not all. Would the cultists left lure the weak minded, would they be allowed to kidnap enough adherents to take us backward into a Christian dystopia again? No, doubtful. As doubtful as our getting to this very possible way of life
>but we will not be free of our bellies!
So eat.

>>14620380
Authoritarianism vs libertarianism.

There’s is a larp for the Roman republic, anarchists want greater freedom for people. Democracy. Real democracy. Not shitty republics.

>>14620370
I’d sooner give you up for dead. You sad boys.

>>14485095
Wrong. There is no going back. There was too much hell back then too. Don’t sugarcoat it. Salvage what you can, certainly not church and religion or kings and kingdoms. I mean salvage the best to combine with the future.

>>14128786
Than why stick up for nation-states, my rightwing anarchist friend?

>>13906390
No need to twist “of use” into eternal bondage and hard work.
You NEET or something?

>>13048674
Something on Aristippus is who you’re probably looking for.
Unless you mean what is now called negative-hedonism, in which case you want Epicurus and Lucretius

>>12841272
What some call necessity others call a waste of time.
“Waste of time” is subjective. Leisure is a necessity

>>12373777
There is no inherent meaning for life, but only death is useless.
Life in fact has a multitude of purposes to choose from