/lit/ - Literature

>>16496892
If you had actually been reading my arguments, thinking about their meaning, and then hermeneutically placing the rest of all my statements in relation to those arguments, than everything above should have already been completely apparent to you. So then when you saw that that when I wrote here >>16488896 "you are confusing normal egoistic awareness with the more subtle and basic primordial awareness which permeates every moment", that I was not actually referring to two separate awarenesses, (as one as a changing thing observed by awareness, could not in fact, be awareness). Admittedly it was bad phrasing to use the word awareness twice, but again if you had even been paying attention I had already explained multiple times in the very same post in which that sentence appeared that anything that changes qua being something which is observed is not actually awareness.

So the two alternatives, are that you either completely failed to comprehend the point of what I was saying and how it applied to your own consciousness (for if you hadn't then you would have known I didn't literally mean two different awarenesses), or you deliberately decided to nitpick at my definitions in bad faith knowing that what you were implying was not what I actually meant. I don't understand how someone could still earnestly deny that they have an awareness which is separate from one's thoughts and sensory perceptions, especially after all the contradictions that this results in were explained in the last thread. I am starting to take the NPC meme more seriously.