/lit/ - Literature

>>14936581
KEK

>>14542836
My idea is that Kant's theory of a priori 'space-ness' is not inextricably bound up with Euclidian geometry en that by extention, positing other theories of Geometry dus not imply that Kant was wrong about this. But he talks of us 'when we imagine any concept, can take that concept, and remove everything from it. Everything except for 'space-ness'. Even after it's complete annihilation of substance, the 'thing' is still deliniated(right word?)and still exists in space(Kant will explain it better then I can). But, ... can we imagine these a space that is non-Euclidian? Is this even the right question to ask? If the answer to my first question is negative, then what are we to to with Kant? Throw it in the bin? Help me out sciencebros