/lit/ - Literature

>>21619915
You don't understand his argument

He's saying that existence is fundamentally a gamble, and it's a gamble that you're making on the behalf of someone else; you have imposed a life onto someone where there is now the potential risk of being thrown into an endless (or even temporal) experience of unbearable torture

The point is that it is not moral to force any sentient being into such a sick, Saw-esque game like that, thus rendering all procreation an act of violence that is committed against a person without their consent