/lit/ - Literature

>last sentence/paragraph of a novel is the same as the first

>>10447163
This has been bugging me. Since there are many logics, how do we know the one we use is the "right" one? It can't be proved empirically, since we're unable to interpret empirical evidence without some sort of logic and logic is what we use to determine which empirical evidence is valid in the first place, e.g. if we think we see something that prior experience + logic tells us is impossible, we conclude that our perception is mistaken, and the only way to "disprove" a logic is on its own terms. Should we really just go with whatever logic is most intuitive? What if the universe doesn't fit our intuitions? Are we just fundamentally fucked then?

>not gay
>don't feel like a tranny
>always self insert as the woman when reading romance

what is wrong with me

>500 word argumentative essay on tarkovsky due friday
>haven't even started yet

what should my argument be /lit/. i'm on a tough spot.

>>7118560
>still can't tell if Latro fucked the trap or not

>Terrified of dying, don't ever want to cease to exist
>Realise that living forever is equally as bad and I'd eventually run out of unique experiences and existence itself would become a literal eternal torture

Are there any works that can help me come to terms with this?