/lit/ - Literature

>>13143224
Not this shit again.

>>12568955
Well, the most important part of the bill is that it is non-binding. this means that it simply there to say "these are our goals", and while i understand that they are coming from a place of altruism the goals are completely fantastical.
I'm not really worried of the bill if it passes since the republican party will just shoot it down on principle but i would genuinely like a bill that was ONLY about reducing carbon emission and focused on the environmental impact that America has.
But seeing as this is /lit/ and not /pol/ you can fuck right off with this.

>>12553841
Well there's your problem. you claimed a group would go to war over an idea of supremacy, and guess which group historically has done that the most.
also i'm guessing you are a white male so they just put 2 and 2 together and assumed you are a nazi. But seeing as how in the OP you aren't exactly opposed to the idea of nazism can you really say they are wrong?
Regardless, you could have gone about it from a different way and claimed that cultures such as mexicans and even african americans would rather stick to their own community and used the vilification of gentrification as an example. An economic benefit to the community is seen as bad due to the preconceived idea that they are trying to take away their identity.

>>12242101
>läser kierkegaard på engelska

>>11978286
Okay but when and where? I'm down with meeting at the met and looking at some art with some anons.

>multiple unironic anti-natalist threads, "hurr durr refute it"
>thinly-veiled blogposting
>write what's on your mind
>belligerent dumb communists everywhere derailing threads
>ChristLARPers and trad-fags derailing threads
>artsy pseuds and avant-teens
>Piercefag shilling CSP
>twitter-tard NPC memes

Is /lit/, dare I say it, beyond saving?
At least acceleration-fags and neo-cons still produce readable threads.

>>11937525
Read up on the mali empire, it's africa's equivalent to rome
>>11937528
As i said, not liking the culture doesn't mean it is right to hate the people who made it. I'm not a fan of christianity but i don't hate white people.
>>11937540
Constructing a group primarily on the negative actions of people from the group will always make monstrosities. If i took all of the bad examples of white people and used them as the basis of what the entire race was like then they would seem like violent hunger psychopaths that will kill to the last man.
>>11937544
an extreme example isn't an accurate representation of how everyone in the group will act. If i go to the rural south of the US i'm not going to assume i'm going to be lynched.
>>11937566
Ah, the old statistics game. if we just put up numbers then of course you can make anything look bad. You have to also put context to said statistics. Most crime happens in low income areas and black are most likely going to reside there. But it's not the race that causes the violence, but simply the desperation of the situation. Areas with "white trash" also have high crime rates.

i dont get it