/lit/ - Literature

>>16249869
behold the sprawling metropolis of the uyghur man, ugh, it's almost identical to thebes.

perhaps you would accept the lolo analogy if they spoke an aryan language? yet again, you are unable to think outside linguistic groups. equating name, race, and language was probably the fundamental disaster of 19th century scholarship. if we had sooner realised these 3 all have commonly individual histories, we wouldn't made such a mess of "prehistory". until you realise your faith in your premises is fundamentally mistaken, you will continue to chase your own tail every time a dig archaeological discovery is made. absolutely pathetic. palaeontologists and geologists surpassed this stage 50 years ago. at least some tenure remoras are a bit less stubborn and have accepted the usefulness and validity of archaeogenetics, which i assume you discard bc it's "reactionary" or bc it involves arithmetic.