/lit/ - Literature

>>11527708
Sounds very spooky.

>>8881535
It makes me right until proven otherwise. Faggot.
Theorizing is the process of creating models until we become as close as possible to the truth. Just because I am not wrong doesn't mean I am not right.

>>8747206
>>8747161
Good work, Stirnerposter who actually read Stirner.

Max Stirner for me.

>>8678651
Stfu pseud.


B o o !

>>8677047
There is no accomplishment or worth to be related to actions of those who are dead. You do not owe them anything. To live your life, or marry someone within your own race, out of some vague mysticism like purity, is a spook. If you find some woman who is black or another race, and she is placed highly in your hierarchy of values, then it supersedes that spookish duty to marry within your own race. Your happiness is more important than your duty to the collective. Unless, of course, you value the future of the collective higher than your own happiness, which is stupid.

Being proud of the decisions made by your ancestors is simply a spook. It doesn't matter what they did and who they married. Live your life however you want.

>>8677070
>Let's say tradition/laws/etc are merely 'spooks' or 'social constructs' - what then?
Then, nothing, just do whatever, as any nihilist would. Murder, or do not matter, it's all a spook anyways. However, if you value your own life and ego, and recognize that others value their own life and ego, then an objective foundation can be established. Laws are placed so that no life or person or group is above others.

>Was Stirner just a nihilist at heart?
Yes.

Ego and it's Own, you are mortally spooked.

>>8659764
>28

>sex is a spook

>stirner x 5

>>8657472
The whale is a spook. Prove me wrong.

>>8657014
SPOOKED

>>8658476
Skip Spookergaard desu

>>8658050
>>8658040
You're all spooked by identity politics.
Samarkand is a lovely piece of my property, but I have yet to attain power over it so cannot tell you for sure.

>>8657921
Are you trying to say you've read any of his works?