/lit/ - Literature

Be honest, /lit/.
Were you ever a Nietzsche fanboy?

>>21662006
>citing yourself

>>21035556
>The greatest thinkers provide medicine, oh shit, that's what it is. The greatest literature always feels like medicine.

>>20321823
>What is your favourite fiction book?

all his pathetic schizo diatribes mean nothing now that hes suffering eternal punishment in hell kek

>>19466599
My Spidey senses detect (((subversion)))! Abandon ship! Basically on the Luke Smith path.
>>19466234
Weltgeist is my Sunday School with Guenon. It's amazing how motivated and discerning you can be when you don't let Jews shit on your soul every week.

>>19388917
Lel Last Woman
I think there's something sinister about the
M'LADY meme
And the
KAREN meme.
Something is off here. The spergs were the last to hold onto the last generation of some concept of a gentleman. The next generation fully glommed on to whatever degenerate shit followed. If you say M'LADY you're the type to strive to be an upstanding cultured type but probably mocked for how far you fall short. But you're not really mocked in good jest you're mocked for trying at all or even looking in that direction instead of silently satisfying yourself in the squalor of red solo cup trap bass booty drunkard music available to you. At some level real Nietzche would be mocked as a 400 LB neckbeard.

>>18365278
Nietzsche was an admitted relativist
his concept of "will to power" doesn't save people from nihilism, it delivers people straight to it
>DUDE JUST MAKE UP YOUR OWN PURPOSE IN LIFE, YOUR OWN ETHICS, YOUR OWN TRUTH, etc...
what could possibly be nihilistic than that?

It's all subjective bro. You can't tell me what my will to power is.

>>18292590
>I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOUR PSYCHOLOGY IS BASED ON A SINGLE INTERNET POST. I AM VERY SMART, PLEASE COMPLIMENT ME.
lol
>>18293071
>muh Nietzschean relativism
lol

>dude just imagine you are powerful lmao

oh boy a neetchuh thread.

Bought "The Gay Science" recently and read a bit, really liked it, is it a good starting point?

>>18143287
>Is Nietzsche right?
The answer is always no.

>>18107183
>In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god's blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence.
Try r/atheism OP. Plenty of Nietzscheans.

>>17664067
>the anti-nietzsche posters have too much power we can't make a single good thread or even post
Nice cope.

>CONSEQUENTLY the Greeks did NOT understand the Greeks.
So can anyone explain why Nietzsche said Homer was a bad artist, rationalist, and slave moralist?

>>17543184
>>17543239
>>17543462
Nietzschefags confirmed even bigger retards than Peterson.

>"God", "immortality of the soul", "redemption", "beyond" -- Without exception, concepts to which I have never devoted any attention, or time; not even as a child. Perhaps I have never been childlike enough for them?
>I do not by any means know atheism as a result; even less as an event: It is a matter of course with me, from instinct. I am too inquisitive, too questionable, too exuberant to stand for any gross answer. God is a gross answer, an indelicacy against us thinkers - at bottom merely a gross prohibition for us: you shall not think!

>>17496370
The Stoic would have you obey an imaginary conductor and play your part in a natural orchestra. Nietzche rocks up to the concert hall of life with his own ghetto blaster

>A marriage proves its excellence by being able to put up with an occasional "exception."
What did he mean by this?

"God", "immortality of the soul", "redemption", "beyond" -- Without exception, concepts to which I have never devoted any attention, or time; not even as a child. Perhaps I have never been childlike enough for them?
I do not by any means know atheism as a result; even less as an event: It is a matter of course with me, from instinct. I am too inquisitive, too questionable, too exuberant to stand for any gross answer. God is a gross answer, an indelicacy against us thinkers - at bottom merely a gross prohibition for us: you shall not think!
I am much more interested in another question,—a question upon which the "salvation of humanity" depends to a far greater degree than it does upon any piece of theological curiosity: I refer to nutrition. "How precisely must thou feed thyself in order to attain to thy maximum of power."

>>17396576
>I'm so sick of this catholic boomer.

>"God", "immortality of the soul", "redemption", "beyond" -- Without exception, concepts to which I have never devoted any attention, or time; not even as a child. Perhaps I have never been childlike enough for them?
>I do not by any means know atheism as a result; even less as an event: It is a matter of course with me, from instinct. I am too inquisitive, too questionable, too exuberant to stand for any gross answer. God is a gross answer, an indelicacy against us thinkers - at bottom merely a gross prohibition for us: you shall not think!

What did he mean by this?