/lit/ - Literature

Any good books here?

>>14343497
Have a chart

I don't get why some of y'all consider this for pseuds. I like posting these, and I don't intend to brag. These are structured reading plans, or at least some of them. Pretty useful if you wanna quit being a pseud.

>>12564044
Also check out chart threads, they are a good way to get into specific kind of books you're interested in.

https://mega.nz/#F!rp0QlKDJ!8f_Ui9_FIyteb-rw11NG4g

>>10491593
Do you want primary or secondary lit?

Here’s a good introduction book, not too long, not too brief. 14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1684/1/Christman,%20John%20-%20Social%20and%20Political%20Philosophy%20-%20Routledge%20Contemporary%20Introductions%20to%20Philosophy.pdf

Pic related is good summary of the major works up to Marx, it’s selection of modern works is dismal, I’m working on a new chart for the 20th century. In the Anglo side at least the big names after the war are Rawls, Nozick, Sandel, Taylor, and GA Cohen. In Europe I’d say Foucault, and Habermas are most important. Just off the top of my head at least. And we are talking political philosophy here, not political science more generally, you aren’t going to find any books on the mathematics of different voting systems here or whatever.

Found this chart here a while back, does it still hold up? Looking to dive into political theory and want to make sure I'm not missing anything