[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.19514656 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 3414AD74-1050-498D-B677-1C6663BE5FD8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19514656

>>19513513
What does Dematteis say?

>> No.19032763 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 7154AA47-B85C-423D-AE4B-BB57526FAC70.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19032763

>>19032480
They both have reasonable critiques of him.

>> No.18503730 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 8ACB53D2-80C2-42C1-AD5B-15D1F99024A0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18503730

>>18503637
All that was soundly refuted in advance though.
No, he doesn’t count here because Stirner isn’t being specifically noncapitalist or nonliberal. He just points out the spooks there. A good critique of Marx, but it doesn’t fit OPs criteria is all.

>> No.18081370 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, F05C950B-059E-4D50-9687-6FD9DD765027.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18081370

He doesn’t negate everything Marx ever wrote
Neither does Bakunin. But it’s very important to question

>> No.18001364 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 957D4760-0182-40D4-9824-C5B1D2CCBDF6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18001364

>>18001248
Read.

>> No.17412831 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, D782F6C0-E8F6-4932-AB78-DC9528EE35D4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17412831

>>17412604
Max debunked him before he wrote a thing about it

>> No.17235394 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, B47E2E09-9A62-4504-842C-9563FEDDCEB9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17235394

>>17233803
>I can’t understand the book
>therefore you are the idiot
If you’re the OP, you have posted one of the most worthless kinds of threads.
If you didn’t understand it, maybe you should read Stirner’s Critics.

>> No.16643427 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 9B003D0A-958E-485F-8C0A-BC008FDD1CA7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16643427

>>16643354
I believe the consensus is that it failed. I forget the nuances, but Marx’s concerns were already dealt with in Stirner’s Critics

>> No.16387042 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 81A58407-E9C8-4F08-820E-BDCB53804C72.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16387042

>>16386978
Cute, but erroneous

>> No.16112220 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 5DFF37A7-1E6D-4597-96BE-1B4268B2AFE3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16112220

>>16112211
Which never happened
This book is where “retroactively btfo” comes from

>> No.15727260 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, EF1E1D1C-90D6-4A0B-97A2-80E7BB55CE91.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15727260

>>15727251
Read a fucking book

>> No.15247211 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 04AA6195-496D-45E5-80C9-0C0A3A257B8B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15247211

>>15247122
Maybe, but since you brought it up, I think it’s best you explain what you mean
Too many threads are based on everyone know concepts A and B and concluding with concept C and you rarely show that you know what concerts A and B are. Not to say you don’t, just to say, make some effort. A little.

>> No.14895637 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, B0FB717A-C557-4B15-95E4-CC04E2251045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14895637

>>14895433
You know that meme about retroactively btfo-ing people?
<— Here Max btfos Marx’s critique before he even wrote it.

>>14895523
I know what I advocate.

>> No.14204891 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 4B97EB67-4702-4A70-B2C5-C913EE7194F8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14204891

>>14204861
It’s all there is of him, and Engels liked him at first, but was always malleable to his friend’s ideas. Marx wasn’t always right

>> No.14095041 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 369F71F7-8DAA-45CD-B483-B8E798CF6C32.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14095041

>>14095019
Stirner describes the world as it is. Have you read it? More closely next time if you have already

>> No.13958354 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, C5A5B8DB-325A-4604-92FE-04576D6F1AF5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13958354

>>13957992
>selfishness
You and Rand get everything wrong from the start.
>bloat
Hilarious reversal technique. Rand is the bloat. Worthless and long in getting there.
If you want to understand the Feuerbach arguments you read this. TUaIP doesn’t need you to though

>> No.13579273 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, A8B02A39-8437-4D73-86FB-BDD927E4E389.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13579273

>>13578973
Feuerbach seems just as much put to bed as Kant after reading this.

>>13579058
Is this Kants idea? Sounds very gnostic.

>> No.13510743 [View]
File: 102 KB, 600x900, 629A3B17-A08C-4F73-9D67-6C793961FACD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13510743

>>13510723
>this is what Marxist-Leninists tell themselves just before bed every night
Quite reversed

>>13510710
Ha!

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]