/lit/ - Literature

>>10691319

Is he? Does he? I lift. I have, in my life, had shoulders like that, triceps like that, certainly better traps and a stronger chest. That said, I've always weighed a few more and never had a jawline like that or hair that cares in wind.

I have always been conscious. I have had thoughts. Our want to dehumanize him because we perceive him as different from us does not actually make him less human. There is no metric stating that an increase in muscle corresponds to a dulling of mind. We only assume.

Take a note from the patricians. One can be strong in mind, as well as body.

>>10140265

Okay, what did I miss? My conception is that the nature of all societal (philosophical, political, interpersonal, etc.) constructs are believed to be spooks because they themselves are just that. Constructions of the mind, which are vapor to the mind that has itself constructed it. I think some hard Stirnerfags actually believe that they live in a universe of their own creation, but the base principle is the aforementioned.

If my understanding of the initial is correct, I'll hold to my prior convictions. I'll admit, however, that I could be wrong about it. Starting with the implication that you are a legitimate individual sincerely representing a position that you either believe in or otherwise understand, what can you tell me to expand my understanding of the Stirner position?

I think I understand the concept, which is why I believe Stirner to be essentially impotent. You can call government, justice, morality, rule of law as spooks, right up until the moment the state executes you for murder. A man kicks a rock and says: "I refute it thusly."

>>10140284

My concept of the general gist is above, again, totally open learning more about the subject.