[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22618292 [View]
File: 136 KB, 520x1200, lit philo stack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22618292

>>22618187
thoughts on this

>> No.21816507 [View]
File: 136 KB, 520x1200, 9d5592a32b6a7514c1913600faae0b7b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21816507

Sorry in advanced if this post is too self-indulgent, but I've been wondering this for a while
I've been wanting to get into philosophy for a while. Most of my knowledge of philosophy comes from dumb youtube videos and other places online. There are some philosophers I'm interested in, some more than others, and some that I'm not despite being seen as very influential. Is there some philosophers who are absolutely necessary to read, or can you skip around freely? Do you truly need to "start with the Greeks," and if so, to what extent do you have to read the works of Plato, Aristotle, etc?
The main philosophers who I'm especially interested in (most though not all of which are from the 20th century onwards), roughly in order of interest, are: Deleuze/Guattari, Spinoza, Camus, Foucault, Marx, Engels, Stirner, Baudrillard, Lacan, Derrida, Bataille, Nick Land, Debord, Hegel, Freud, Kant, Fichte, and Zizek
Pic not related btw

>> No.21059437 [View]
File: 136 KB, 520x1200, 9d5592a32b6a7514c1913600faae0b7b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21059437

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]