/lit/ - Literature

>>13880889
"me put benis in gash, me think is was best moment of life"

>>13858005
>nice waffling mate

>>13819562
>tell me why i should accept the lie that a bastard jew is gods son.
>hurdur krishna reincarnate many time in many form, he muh god now

shut up, hinduism requires you not only to believe a god became a many once, but also many times. if that's your problem with christianity then i think you need to rethink some things lmaoooo

>>13758949
>If the space between A and B can be divided an infinite amount of times then movement from A to B wouldn't be possible.
Pathetic post.

I can't get into fiction
They are all either Oscar bait highbrow Bullshit or sci-fi / fantasy (which is just a regular story coated with Bullshit words)
Only one in a gorillion books know how to have fun or use their setting in a interesting way
I read mostly unapologetic books which purpose is to make you feel a strong emotion like feeling like shit or love-warm-waifuing-romance-whatever or prose porn, etc

I can't be the only one that feels this way

Don't get me started with poetry

>>13610208
WTF are you on about, tard? America hasn't regulated shit, they're going the complete opposite way, deregulating everything and creating monopolies which has resulted in the shittiest products for the highest prices. There is a reason why USA counts as a third world shithole and Europe as the civilized part of the world.

>b-b-but the TV said I'm free and murrica is #1 at everything

lmao, my nigga, lmao

>>13599894
>art is not art

>>13593330
>need moar ancient superhero comix

>>13403202
>Of course objective eyesight isn't real, whatever that even means.
Duuuurrr what are photons

>>13367503
>Also it is literally impossible to be apolitical, everything is political.

will reading make me smart?

>>13311461
>french man bad

>>13271598
>if you had actually bothered to look at the link you just googled up, you'd have realized that it goes against your claims.

Not at all my friend! My original claim was that men are falling behind in academia because of the different aspects of modern society and technology that they are more susceptible to than their female counterparts. The source I provided supports this in the sense that women make up more degree holders overall. Furthermore, every year, the disparity between men applying for college and women applying for college is increasing, see https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/08/why-men-are-the-new-college-minority/536103/ or https://www.statista.com/statistics/236360/undergraduate-enrollment-in-us-by-gender/ or maybe even https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/06/womens-college-enrollment-gains-leave-men-behind/ .

And so my original argument remains intact. As to the first part of my argument, regarding the susceptibility of our male brains, see; https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101018112308.htm or https://www.drdouglas.org/drdpdfs/Gentile_Pathological_VG_Use_2009e.pdf .

Thank you for playing!

>ooga booga
>I kill people
>pee pee poo poo

>>13221413
>leftists calling other people liberals

>HURRRRRR DURRRR IS AD HOMINEM VALID?
FUCK OFF NIGGER

>the Kantian analysis of thought disproved the possibility of any direct and real experience of the divine or the realization and attainment of mystic oneness because things of that nature inevitably conforms to the catagories of thought and so can never actually reveal reality as it is but only a shadow of it; even though if God or the Monad/One/Brahman was real and all-encompassing then there is no reason why the divine should not be able to reveal itself in a direct and unmediated way to people who possess the proper requisites and who take the right steps.

Is there a more brainlet take on mysticism and spirituality? (aside from unironic biological-reductionist materialism)

>>13022302
Wittgenstein, the greatest philosopher of all time

Does anyone else think philosophy sounds fucking gay and retarded based on how faggots online talk about it? It sounds like comic books or wrestling for gay hipsters when you talk about it in such way
>Jean-Paul Sartre is way better than Nietchze dude! Zizek would so destroy Peterson in a debate, faggot!
It's a pure battle of pretentiousness with no intellectual discussion in sight.

>>12638459

>>12628030

>durrrr human nachurrrr
>dude just grow up lmao
>haha I gotcha! you are critiquing society while you are a part of society! hehe i am so intelligent

How I know you are a pseud:

You
>reference Swedenborg
>read Houellebecq
>think John Dewey is a good philosopher
>think Joyce is a good author
>are a woman
>use the word 'accelerationist' unironically
>have uttered the phrase 'ride the tiger'
>are more familiar with the Mahabharata than the New Testament
>use the word 'absolute' to describe the deity
>think Edward Feser is a good contemporary philosopher
>admire the Medieval era for its metaphysics rather than its numinosity
>read any authors that wear or have worn t-shirts
>wear jeans
>have used the word 'blockchain' in the past seven days
>try to give sage advice in sadpepe threads
>can't think past the worldview of Ligotti and Lovecraft
>have posted links to Manly Hall videos
>think Nietzsche is a great philosopher
>think some hip-hop is redeemable
>have ever read a full work by a beat poet
>enjoy posting in Hegelian or Landian gibberish
>think science has made philosophy redundant
>can't appreciate wise heathens like Taleb

>>12423685
>>12423690
>anything I dont understand is obscurantist word salad!