/lit/ - Literature

>Socrates: And about knowledge and ignorance in general; see whether you think that any man who has knowledge ever would wish to have the choice of saying or doing more than another man who has knowledge. Would he not rather say or do the same as his like in the same case?
>Thrasymachus: That, I suppose, can hardly be denied.
>Socrates: And what of the ignorant? would he not desire to have more than either the knowing or the ignorant?
>Thrasymachus: I dare say.
>Socrates: And the knowing is wise?
>Thrasymachus: Yes.
>Socrates: And the wise is good?
>Thrasymachus: True.
>Socrates: Then the wise and good will not desire to gain more than his like, but more than his unlike and opposite?
>Thrasymachus: I suppose so.
>Socrates: Whereas the bad and ignorant will desire to gain more than both?
>Thrasymachus: Yes.

No Socrates, you fucking retard. Of course the knowledgeable want to outdo each other. Else every field would be uniform and doctors wouldn't disagree in how to treat a patient, or builders in how to build a building
This man is a fucking baboon. How can he be so revered for the last 3 thousand years?

>>13334688
To clarify, the question isn't WHY should you do something, it's WHAT should you do. For example, should I have these kinds of images of teenage girls saved on my computer? Probably not. Am I a godless wastrel who doesn't care about his or the world's degeneration? Emphatically so, pic related.