/lit/ - Literature

Give me some books that are controversial for whatever reason. E.g. they make people seethe, they're polarising, hotly debate or whatever. Fiction or non fiction. Basically any book that would make someone raise their eyebrows and say "why do you have *that* book?" if they saw it on your shelf.

>you dont even know what the word bewildered means

>>21543159
Chud was the one who lived underground while Chad invented fire
Chud also invented slave morality by crucifying himself, no one knew what he was doing but he was very smug about it

>>21537280
I just realized this post sounded way happier and sappier than I actually intended.

No, this is not a blue-eyed hopium “just be yourself bro xD” post. I am still a firm believer in the blackpill. I still sympathize with incels, even after a beautiful, intelligent woman approached me first, held conversations with me about art and architecture and science and ultimately let me fondle her in various ways, kiss her and almost begged me to hold her hand while we walked. I am still an incel sympathizer.

Let me tell you why.

It’s because EVEN SHE CARED ABOUT APPEARANCE, ultimately, even though we initially bonded over having very similar personalities and intellects.

We spent around 15 hours together so far, visiting art galleries and museums, the cinema, the opera, cafes, or just straying around the city. We complimented each other often. But I never complimented her appearance. Never. She is hot. I know she knows she is hot. I know she knows I know she is hot.

I purposefully never mentioned the obvious fact I and most other men want to pump her full of semen, I skipped this self-explanatory banality. I focused my attention and compliments on her personality, thoughts and dreams completely.

She did not. She constantly complimented my appearance in ways both subtle and admiring. Try to guess how often she complimented my height (I am around 6’2’’, which is considered ideal female preference by most lookism / blackpill content)? Once? Twice?

Yeah. Five times. Five separate times, she repeated it like some sort of mantra: “anon, did I tell you you are tall yet”? Another time, she mentioned my thick hair in a positive fashion. I don’t care. I don’t want YOU to care. I don’t want it to matter.

So even this genuinely very smart (her IQ was professionally tested and is above 120), very educated, very classy, very nuanced woman, the least superficial I have ever met, STILL cared a great lot about how long my fucking leg bones were and whether I was prematurely balding. And if I did, there’s a chance we never would have bonded, even though we are soulmates.

If anything, this experience blackpilled me even more. Even the smartest young woman still is prey to her biological instincts.

Pic related is still me.
Even though a genuinely wonderful woman took enormous interest in me, I am still a Chud (no, not the /pol/ kind - I could not care less about identity politics).
I will always remain a Chud.
Even if I have sex with this extremely desirable woman. Or another woman who approaches me herself.
Even if we become a long-term couple.

I will mentally always sympathize with incels: even though I disagree with their misogyny, they remain mostly about how attraction is formed and how men are discriminated against due to their genetics.

Thanks for reading my blog.

>Nice attempt at a burn but I'm actually a Marcionite/Manichean ideologue.

>>20949198
Nah, people enjoy art to evoke emotion. AI can't do that. Only humans

Maybe in another 50-100 years

>I cant have sex because cultural marxists in universities (that I never attended)

>Yeah, I'm trad. I love gay sex with Sir.

>>19072053
>I wish it just said "Blacks have better dicks" instead of this cutesy Googlespeak faggotry.

>>18951690
To say anything is verbiage