/lit/ - Literature

>>20509549
>If you disagree after this and still accuse us of slavery then it is solely out of your own stubbornness
No, it is because you failed to address the links, and that I trust them more than I trust you.

Also, I assume that verse you posted was revealed when slavery was still legal, as, according to your own post, 'the abolition of slavery wasn't immediate'. (Thus conceding that at least Islam condoned slavery at least in the past.) If this was the case, I suspect that you're misinterpreting the verse as the people of your own prophet's time who actually did have slaves would obviously disagree with your own conclusion.