/lit/ - Literature

>>13612319
Both socialism and communism come in many varieties, such as anarchist versions.
And what do they anyhow have to do with exclusively with "collectivism", when establishing workplace democracy and shit like that could as easily be considered individuals taking additional control over their own lives? Fucking hell, you could in a sense consider capitalism to be collectivist as all hell, as people surrender themselves to the whims of "the business", "the boss", or "the market".

To quote Stirner, the most OG individualist to have ever lived:
>The laborers have the most enormous power in their hands, and, if they once became thoroughly conscious of it and used it, nothing would withstand them; they would only have to stop labor, regard the product of labor as theirs, and enjoy it. This is the sense of the labor disturbances which show themselves here and there.
>The State rests on the — slavery of labor. If labor becomes free. the State is lost.