/lit/ - Literature

Qaradawi

>>13732017
From his work, The Limits of Fiqh

>>13715439
From The Limits of Fiqh

>>13643549
To answer your question, Guénon and Nasr are both perennialists. Meaning any dogmatic revolution which says this religion is right and the others are wrong is anathema to them, even if tolerates other religions. Nasr's Quran is very good but his agenda is poor. Of course a traditionalist revolution is possible, Sayyid Qatb and Maududi are extremely influential theorists of it, Maududi was very influenced by Lenin and sought to mold an international revolutionary traditionalism. Saudi Arabia was initially very supportive of that but are now against it because the House of Saud depends on the House of Al ash-Sheikh (Wahhab's family) and vice versa for regional power and they realized such a revolutionary party is bent on a new Empire without petty locam rulers. The Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood--Hamas is a branch) is increasingly functioning as this party (pic related, Qaradawi) and so they are now at odds with Saudi Arabia. Also sometimes with Egyptian Salafis who despite supporting a revolutionary party, oppose democracy and think voting and running democratically is haram. The Ikhwan favor using both revolution and democratic office. But that's the state of things. Saudi Arabia is definitely a traditionalist state because their law is limited to Quran and Sunnah but their leadership is amoral and sides with Jews. Qatar (which hosts both the Ikhwan and the Taliban) is in the right corner although also willing to do the wrong thing, Erdogan is also in the right corner, hopefully Turkey will see an Islamic Revolution and overthrow secularism.

https://twitter.com/ApostateRidvan/status/1157427161743134721?s=19

Opinions on Yusuf al-Qaradawi? I don't agree with a lot of his fiqh but his political analysis is great and should be read by everyone.

https://twitter.com/Kasey________/status/1160525113588166656?s=19