/lit/ - Literature

>>9042290
Well for starters stop using memes like cultural marxism because not even the Frankfurt school knows what that means.

For a reading list here is leftypol's recommended lit

>>6784434
Where do find such a rare-specimen? This above anarcho-primitivists
>>6784511
Does anyone on this board actually read economic books that aren't pop-economics? I have never actually seen the content of economic litterature debated on this forum or discussed beyond >implying.
>>6784795
This is fairly tumblr on that matter, you will probably encounter a couple in this thread.
>>6784966
Neoconservatism won't have much defenders on 4chan, as /pol/ regards them as too jewish. Which in their defense is sort of true, as the movement was started by jewish-trotskiests.
>>6786468
Guess who doesn't know that Somalia used to be a communist state before it became fucked up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_Democratic_Republic
>Barre's administration would rule Somalia for the following 21 years, until the outbreak of the civil war in 1991.
>>6786565
>Equatorial Guinea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_Guinea#Independence_.281968.29
>In July 1970, Macias Nguema created a single-party state and made himself president for life in 1972. He broke off ties with Spain and the West. In spite of his condemnation of Marxism, which he deemed "neo-colonialist", Equatorial Guinea maintained very special relations with socialist countries, notably China, Cuba, and the USSR. He signed a preferential trade agreement and a shipping treaty with the Soviet Union. The Soviets also granted loans to Equatorial Guinea.[20]

>>6728650
There isn't, you have just been trained to like one and feel repusled by the other when they make the same statements. Most people on this board apply the gentic fallacy on a consistent basis. I don't think all the philosophy you guys are reading are having any significant effects on your critical thinking skills. The statements on this forum are more convoluted and better written than other boards, but not more factual or deeper.

Lastly a question, why do none of you seem to get what is refered to in this picture?

>>6693135
>>6693247

>>6689428
I fixed it.