/lit/ - Literature

>>23034693
>stop dehumanizing huge swathes of people
HAHAHHAHAHA

Fuck off faggot. All 3rd world dogs will be sent back. They have no respect for our people/nations and have no right to occupy White lands, especially when they take so much and contribute so little.

>>22334148
True, Arabs are almost as bad as blacks. They tend to be less openly violent, but still, the stats speak for themselves. None of these people belong in Europe. They need to be sent back. The majority don't work either, that is a lie perpetuated by the media. Like most minorities, they are a massive burden on the White taxpayer.

I can show you many examples of middle easterners executing white children in Europe. It happens a lot, but the media ignore it, because they want to replace ethnic Europeans with a mutt slave class.

>>21621655
Then you are willfully blind, for a woman and a young girl it can be one of the most harrowing experiences you can subject her to. Unless you mean those rare Asians that are of light skin, Japanese for instance? I can only assume you do not mean Indian, Pakistani, Bengali or any of those other turd-obbessed child-rapers.

Skin color is directly tied with safety in the public space. Light skin color is directly parallel to safety.

No. His only real talent is being allowed to antagonize muslims without being called racist and being a close friend of Christopher Hitchens, his writing is pretty bland.

Get these 3rd world dogs out of the West.

>>21048071
>Nationalism was the end of white people in Europe.
Civic Nationalism was the end, thinking that nationalism without an ethnic component was just as good. The various nations and states that bred conflict in Europe bred competition and made them strong. This peace at all costs is what made us weak, just as the importation of millions of non-Europeans has. I suspect you are of some ambiguous brown color.

Nationalism without ethnic pride is poison.
Nationalism with ethnic pride is the tightest bond that can be forged in a nation.

>>20691593
>They saw the Jews as their enemy and so thought it was justified to exterminate them, because it’s “for the good of the race”. They weren’t moral people.

They were moral. Had they seen the outcome of the war they may of fought harder, had our grandfathers known what would happen when they won we would of joined with them.

>>20438198
>If that was genuinely true then no one would have dared to convert to a Jew religion like Christianity. Nationalism is a 19th century invention.

Christianity was the first of many nails that splintered the concept of a nation. Previously religion was a general thing, the Gods favored the bold, the strong, the wise and the fortunate. They received praise for their actions, hoping the Gods would notice.

Christianity did the inverse, it promised reward for meekness, cowardice and turning the other cheek. As said earlier >>20436960, in the face of a multi-ethnic nation, Christianity failed to last even a century. This is a far cry from the Holy Roman Empire or even the Byzantine. As none of these contained any serious demographic of Africans in anything resembling positions of power. Had we not converted to Christianity I imagine life would be far better as the morals and virtues espoused in the native religion are far superior to the ones espoused by Christ.

>>19960845
>I'm Far-Right

So you are Far-Right but not an ethno-nationalist or Fascist? If so you're just a typical conservative with boomer level political opinions.

>>19802398
>"the white race"
You keep saying 'White', say Germanic, that is what they fought for. You're still stuck in 1944.

Europe should be for Europeans, not Africans, not Asians, not Middle-Easterners, not Indians. It is wild that the very hurdle that prevented Europeans from collectivizing around ethnicity is the very thing you have removed from their path. Better each other than what we see out there.