[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.22339704 [View]
File: 120 KB, 600x504, godel[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22339704

>>22338654
>retroactively debunks your multi volume work and renders it useless
GOD is great.
S.D.G.

>> No.11193793 [View]
File: 116 KB, 600x504, why dont you take a seat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11193793

>Gödel’s theorem refutes Hilbert and by extension Popper

>Gödel's theorem cant be refuted or falsified

who wins?

>> No.11049230 [View]
File: 116 KB, 600x504, why dont you take a seat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049230

stacking turtles again, son?

>> No.11010034 [View]
File: 116 KB, 600x504, why dont you take a seat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11010034

>> No.9243228 [View]
File: 116 KB, 600x504, godel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9243228

>>9243179
Modern science is a branch of philosophy you dingo.

Also, possibly every formal system we devise is inherently limited. Enter philosophy.

>> No.5293666 [View]
File: 116 KB, 600x504, godel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5293666

What are the philosophical implications of the godel's incompleteness theorem ?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]