/lit/ - Literature

>>20509249
>I was merely faithfully reporting what she has said. If there is anything "maligning" in there, it's because of her character, not because of what I say
You are a deceptive, dishonest rafidhi without shame. You started your thread by misrepresenting multiple narrations, exemplifying the traditional rafidhi dishonesty.
>The Prophet used to receive divine revelations during intercourse with her. This is why the other wives were jealous.
False. The hadith you yourself quoted said nothing of intercourse, nor that it was the reason for the other wives being jealous. As for the Prophet ﷺ receiving revelation while in her bed, what would be the problem with that? He received revelation while walking, sitting, or riding his mounts as well.
> She used to lie down in front of the Prophet between him and the Qibla when he was praying
Again, what would be the problem? Their house was basically 3x3m, and the Prophet ﷺ spent most of the nights in prayer. There was little room for her to lie sleeping.
> The Prophet used to "fondle" her when she was in her periods
More rafidhi deceit. There is nothing wrong in touching or fondling your wife during her menses.
> The Prophet saw her two times in his dreams before marrying her. Both of the times she was being carried by an angel, and both of the times he tells the angel to "uncover her" so he could take a look.
And? His marriage to Zaynab was ordained by God, why would it be a problem that his marriage to Aishah was so as well?
>She and the Prophet were once lying down unclothed under the sheets on the bed in Aisha's house
The very hadith you quote is a proof against you. The Prophet ﷺ was wrapped in the sheet, but was dressed underneath, as proven by his removing the sheet and giving it to Aishah to cover herself better. Neither one of them were naked, and the reason for their changing covers was to not make Uthman feel awkward intruding on them.
Lastly, yes, Aishah is the mother of the believers, according to the Quran - and as you rafidah reject her, that is proof enough against you.