/lit/ - Literature

>cancels your thread

As long as you’re not a smooth-brained hylic you’ll be able to logically deduce the transcendent after a shot and pleasant read through.

>>15823815
Don’t need to read a dialogue when you have the next best thing!

>>15045894
No because this ones better

>>15036538
>>15036081
The Lord hath truly blessed me upon reading such based words of the Absolute. Allahu akbar.

Accelerationism is wrongly based off the precedent that one is seeing the future from the last; that by looking at the shadow of the being, one is analyzing the noumena of the being. You know it’s ‘there’, but it really doesn’t exist and is only a reflection of your own actions and is only a unification of the phenomena and Absolute. Exteriority is an abstraction of the interior and is a derivative of God.

This Absolute unites both universal and individual experience, stepping beyond mere subjectivity into a higher experience of pure unity. While different paths to this truth are possible, truth itself is preexistent and enternal rather than a synthesis of dialectical opposites that play out over history, as Hegel argues;
Not everything that exists is real, and not everything that is real exists.

Also, considering that every philosophical system is a given perspective and part of the whole, every explanation of the whole is circular because the whole itself is a circle. You’ll never find a direct answer to the questions of Being - every attempt to view the being directly leads to a consideration of something else: the properties of the being, it’s formal structure, an abstract concept, and so on.
We do not need to see everything, but we do not also need the know “the thing in itself” without having the ability to grasp the whole. That which is present can also be absent; in the particular case, the Idea of beauty is no longer present in what ceases to be beautiful. It is present in the original of the image embodied in the morphe (shape), and so that which provides us the criterion or reference point for the various perspective that we open up in investigation of the nature of the Being.
>>15036570
>I’ll read this later, but you sound like you’re seething
You sound like a fucking faggot.
>>15036830
>And? They're not playing a game of truth.
Leftists home the claim to moral high ground in the effort to fully exterminate dissenting opinion as a literal “war to end all wars.”

>>15021001
Read this, then come back to me.

Coronavirus is God punishment upon the CCP for their attempts to create unnatural animal hybrids. The mutations follow the unfolding fibonacci sequence. Now you know. Read some books once in a while.

>>14654803
Read attached and realize you’re no where near my level.

>synthesizes metaphysics and empiricism
Heh, nothing personal, kid

>>14533603
yes

>>14531579

>>14512840
de Beer references Yockey and Spengler a view times in this book. It’s a well rounded scientific basis for people inclined to the far right

Okay this shit slaps

>>14499020
>he shows that the correlation between socio-economic status and IQ is effectively zero
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
>his also makes Murray's thesis highly immoral because it's not right to trap people in imaginary boxes, such as IQ
Nature is immune to the rules of morality.
>b-but muh studies show the correlation between IQ and wealth
Only retards claim makes IQ immediately makes you wealthy.
>Secondly, IYI psychologists do not know anything about statistics — they seem to think it's about interpreting noise. With an r2 of zero, IQ correlates with socioeconomic status by exactly 0%
Again, irrelevant to whether or not IQ exists.
>b-but muh blacks score lower
>While true, it's entirely meaningless and unscientific; it is meaningless because IQ is meaningless and unscientific — it tells us exactly nothing.
It tells us Blacks are poor at inheriting more complex traits of behavior you fucking twat.
>Those are completely BS. The fraudsters getting the data — ie Lynn — don't even go to the countries to get the data, they fabricate numbers, use unscientific measurements such as IQ, and make assumptions to get their numbers. I'd like to also point out that they always give Middle Eastern and Near Eastern countries an IQ in the 80s, but Lebanese, and a few other, diaspora have higher incomes in the US than diaspora with supposedly higher IQs, like the Chinese and Europeans; this doesn't sound right when IQ is supposed to correlate with wealth — but both you and I know the reason now.
Is this is suppose to invalidate the validity of IQ tests, then why should I believe climate predictions?

>>14499116
What a retarded non-sequitur. >>14499307
Orthodox Protestantism. Read “From Logos to Bios” by Wynand de Beer. The religion will form a continuation of metaphysical creation and evolution so as to satisfy the rift between those who are pro-science and those who are pro-creation.

Okay this shit slaps

i like their cover art