/lit/ - Literature

>>10330061
>We must define what a political system ought to achieve clearly and then we can debate the merits of the philosopher-king.

Isn't this a point covered by Nietzsche - should society exist for the benefit of the majority or for its highest achievers?

Most people I've encountered recently that are 'politically energized' never seem to have considered this end-point scenario.

I think Nietzsche believes it should be a constant state of revolution, so a chaotic system should replace an ordered on endlessly.

Does this mean trying to define an end goal for a political system is futile?