/lit/ - Literature

>>14003657
>if a theory fails, you scrap it
Nope. You revise it by learning from past mistakes. You think right wing ideology isnt constantly revising and changing itself? How about the great depression? World war 1? World war 2? All of the other recessions? All of the famines and death caused by right wing policies, such as the irish potato famine. How do you simply ignore and apologize for these? How does your logic not dictate that right wing ideology is not completely bogus then?
>we have tried leftism it didnt work
No, leftism works better than rightist ideology. Western european nations used to have many socialist programs that provided much better lives to their people. The soviet union provided a better life to its people compared to the russian federation. Communist Cuba provides a much better life to its people than it did as America's brothel.

The reason why right wing ideology prevails, is because it is more productive. It is better at enslaving. The fundamentally retarded thing about a rightist is that they believe this is a good thing. They believe because the capitalist machine is more powerful, it is better, from a moral perspective. They believe that this power, no matter to what end, is better, because it is larger. This is wrong. You do not get the benefits of this power, its power comes from forcing longer hours, forcing you to do shitty jobs because they create the most value to the machine. It rapes your culture, it defaces your cities, it destroys your environment. And you believe it deserves to because it has the most power.

Right wing ideology believes that what produces the most GDP is what is best. But why? To what end? Why is productivity good, in and of itself, despite the fact that men have lived happier and freer lives in lower productivity economies?