/lit/ - Literature

THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES IS «UNITEDSTATIAN».

CLARICE LISPECTOR, DANIEL SADA, HORACIO QUIROGA, JUAN RULFO, ELENA PONIATOWSKA, JUANA DE IBARBOUROU, JEROME DAVID SALINGER.

IMAGINE USURPING AN ENTIRE CONTINENT’S NAME BECAUSE YOUR CREATIVITY IS NOT ENOUGH TO GIVE YOUR COUNTRY A PROPER NAME.

>>19810319
>Do you like [UNITEDSTATIAN] literature?

>>19792933
>1. Any books about the life experience of native Europeans and their descendants. [SIC]

NOT A DEFINITION.


>2. Cultures created by native-Europeans or their descendants. It can also refer to pale skin and European features[...] [SIC]

1. DEFINE: «CULTURE».

2. DEFINE: «NATIVE EUROPEANS OR THEIR DESCENDANTS».

3. DEFINE: «EUROPEAN FEATURES».


>[...] the Zebra killers were targeting people for their looks, after all. [SIC]

LIKE YOU ARE JUDGING OTHERS BY THEIR «LOOKS» —ID EST: SKINCOLOUR—, AND HOW SO CALLED «WHITES» —REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER THAT ACTUALLY MEANS— WERE/ARE TARGETING & KILLING PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THEIR «LOOKS»?


>3. People with a lot of ancestry that is native European. [SIC]

DEFINE: «A LOT OF ANCESTRY».


>4. People of mostly African descent who live in the USA. [SIC]

1. THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES IS: «UNITEDSTATIAN», NOT: «AMERICAN».

2. SO, UNITEDSTATIANS? HOW IS THE PREFIX «AFRICAN» NECESSARY, OR IMPORTANT?


>5. People of mostly European descent who live in the USA. [SIC]

1. THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES IS: «UNITEDSTATIAN», NOT: «AMERICAN».

2. SO, UNITEDSTATIANS? HOW IS THE PREFIX «EUROPEAN» NECESSARY, OR IMPORTANT?

>>19696583

>>19667869

>>19660097
>I'm looking for books about the era of alcohol prohibition in [UNITEDSTATES][.]

THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES IS: «UNITEDSTATIAN».

>>19340570


1. YOU MEAN: «UNITEDSTATES», OR: «UNITED STATES OF AMERICA», NOT: «AMERICA»; QVOD VIDE IMAGE ATTACHED TO THIS POST.

2. NO; UNITEDSTATES IS PHŒNICEICAL, NOT ROMAICAL; THE HISTORICAL ARCHETYPE OF UNITEDSTATES IS NOT ROMA, BUT, RATHER, CARTHAGO.

BEGIN BY GIVING THE POLITICAL STATE AN ACTUAL PROPER NAME; EVERYTHING ELSE SHOULD FOLLOW FROM THERE.

>>19018404
>Franch is a better version of you deal with it.

?


>But seriously, I never did get why people call it latin america...

THE REASON IS MENTIONED IN THE IMAGE ATTACHED TO MY PREVIOUS POST: THE FALLACIOUS IDEA OF «LATINOAMERICA» IS FOUNDED ON THE SPURIOUS CONCEPT OF: «LATINITY», WHICH WAS AN INSTRUMENT TO RATIONALIZE FRENCH EXPANSIONISTIC PRETENSES IN AMERICA.

THIS FALLACIOUS IDEA WAS THEN COOPTED BY UNITEDSTATES IN PRO OF THEIR EXPANSIONISTIC PRETENSES, AS A MEANS OF NEGATIVE, ALIENATING DISTINCTION OF THE SPECIES OF «US VERSVS THEM», BETWEEN ANGLOAMERICA ON «THEIR SIDE», AND HISPANOAMERICA, AND LUSOAMERICA ON «THE OTHER SIDE»; FROM THIS «LATINOAMERICANIZATION» DERIVES THE OTHER FALLACIOUS IDEA OF: «THE AMERICAS».

THE FALLACIOUS IDEA OF «LATINOAMERICA» WAS USED BY UNITEDSTATIANS INSTEAD OF THE GENUINE ONE OF: «IBEROAMERICA», BECAUSE THE LATTER IDEA IMPLIES A CATHOLICAL SUBSTANCE INHERENT TO THE HISPANICAL, AND TO THE LUSITANICAL, WHILST THE FORMER IS ABSTRACT TO THE DEGREE OF INSUBSTANTIALITY, THEREBY NULLIFYING THE HISPANICAL, AND THE LUSITANICAL, COMPONENTS, WHICH REDOUNDS IN FACILITATION OF THEIR DOMINATION OF IBEROAMERICAN STATES.


>THe gestalt culture...

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS: «CULTURE», REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER YOU MEAN BY: «THE GESTALT CULTURE».


>... of the southern parts of the Americas...

AMERICA IS ONE CONTINENT.

«UNITEDSTATIAN» IS THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES, NOT: «AMERICAN».

«UNITEDSTATIAN» IS THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES, NOT: «AMERICAN».

>>18905523


YOU MEAN: «UNITEDSTATIAN», NOT: «AMERICAN».

>>18861587
>ITT we write poems for the [UNITEDSTATIAN] veterans[.]

>>18854764


1. THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES IS: «UNITEDSTATIAN».

2. NO.

THE ACTUAL TERM IS: «AMERINDIAN» («AMERICAN INDIAN»), NOT: «NATIVE AMERICAN»; A NATIVE AMERICAN IS ANYONE WHO WAS BORN IN AMERICA, REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY.

THE DEMONYM OF UNITEDSTATES IS: «UNITEDSTATIAN», NOT: «AMERICAN».

>>18652501
>>18652497