/lit/ - Literature

The question is then is there a hierarchy in persons that are more conscious of God, if there is no free will does that create a Calvinist esq elicit? If one system generates a consciousness in kind that is clear without there choice, and another without their choice lives wholly in suffering, in illusion and fear and despair, who can they come to be clear as well, is there a justice that they will come to understand? If they could have solidarity there fear and despair would be lifted. Are they doomed to suffer, if they are then I will have to find God in that with great difficulty, if not then I can easily find God there by helping them. Though it is not a free choice to help them or not, it may still become that it is done. One life, no free will, yet most of them will suffer all that time. Where is Solidarity in that?

>>19363468
>proof
thinking god needs your pathetic reason
faith is beyond reason
no better than some one that thinks they have evidence for Noah's ark
total fucking mid wit

You must have mistaken me for a fool, Immanuel. I'm not anon. My name is Johannes, de Silentio. Now perish.

>>18785149
>drink water and you'll regret it, don't drink water and you'll regret it too
holy shit I hate this fucking website

>>18264421
>Catholicism founded on reason
DELET THIS

>>18191063
>Can somebody explain me the Five Ways?
No its all pseudo logic, and besides the only right way to love God is fideism, faith its self.

>>18133348
three good languages fused together to make a better one.

>>17321763
You have autism if you don't get that this is a joke dunking of Hegel.

>>17238858
fAGGOT

>>16720292
I don't know anything about kierkegaard but I have this picture saved. Was he really as handsome as he looks here or was he treated generously by the portrait artist?

>>16668038
You atleast need to read Genesis. Kierk refers to Abraham a whole lot especially in Fear and Trembling.

Also reading Matthew and Luke is very important as well to just get a good idea on Christ as a person. Kierk philosophizes on the virtues of Christ's teachings and life. He concludes that Christ is a perfect basis for ones philosophical virtues which applies towards his concept of the Knight of Faith (Although later thinkers try to interpret this as a more spiritual leap then a Christian leap later on).

>>16654238
You want 4chan to write your essay anon, are you *sure*?

>>16613326
Delete

>>16242077
>so yeah

>>16216442
DELETE THIS

>>16201931
>In an article in 1999 Atlantic Monthly, Gerd Puin is quoted as saying that:

>My idea is that the Koran is a kind of cocktail of texts that were not all understood even at the time of Muhammad. Many of them may even be a hundred years older than Islam itself. Even within the Islamic traditions there is a huge body of contradictory information, including a significant Christian substrate; one can derive a whole Islamic anti-history from them if one wants.

>The Koran claims for itself that it is 'mubeen,' or 'clear,' but if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn't make sense. Many Muslims—and Orientalists—will tell you otherwise, of course, but the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible—if it can't even be understood in Arabic—then it's not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not—as even speakers of Arabic will tell you—there is a contradiction. Something else must be going on.

>>15809807
Soren here, stop telling people i'm dead.

>>15783216
>>15784020
Holy...Cringe

>>15410474
>Once you prove theism

>>15238999
>I dont even speak the languages most of the time
kill your self you pretentious faggot

>>15189555
>>15189588
>I'm gonna beat you up over the internet
Get off this fucking broad and website 15 year old incel

>>15185709
>beauty is an objective analytic thing

>>15090275
Sage

>>14894963
>5 PROOFS for GOD that DESTROY ATHEISTS
>uhm god doesn't exist
>Why are you making claims you can't prove?