/lit/ - Literature

>>19031735
He studied insects (entomology, not ethnology), ecology and politics. I was hoping for a recommendation more definitive (for instance, by a specialist, not in insects.

>>19031775
I had never heard that stat before. Thanks man. However, if something can't even be used as manure, the 'it's totally clean, bro' comment guys often give doesn't seem very convincing. Also, usually I see gay men bragging about not needing to wear condoms.. although that isn't indicative of the whole gay population. I know promiscuity is partially cultural but the whole inability to conceive thing obviously plays a larger role. If anything is evolutionarily qualified, it would be sexuality (if evolutionary theory is correct); just doesn't seem to add up in any cleanly without forcing what is into conformity with theory.

P.S. FUCK THE CAPTCHA

Hackett is my favorite when it comes to their philosophy line. I haven't seen anything more thorough. Are the other genres Hackett publishes gone through with a similar fine-toothed comb or should I stick with Oxford Press and Modern Library for classics?