[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.22689400 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22689400

>>22689389
>You can actually measure what people produce
Riiight (pic related)

>corporations do it everyday
Corporations designate thingamabobs with price-tokens. It tells us nothing about *what* is being produced and designated.

>> No.22668647 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22668647

>>22667557
Machines and tools are unmesurable, chud. Thus you don't have an objective calculable unit of measure.

Which isn't some grand reveal: it's an open secret ever since Veblen contrasted industry vs business.

>> No.22597602 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22597602

>>22597464
>by obtaining average technological level and the average work intensity and seeing the output
How do you measure output?

>> No.21944078 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21944078

>>21944062

>> No.21829092 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21829092

>>21829067
>Are you serious trying to push supply side economic theory?
No, because one cannot define the supply side in a non-problematic way, as well.

>> No.20510886 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20510886

>>20508123
>Economics is literally the study of doing things that will increase productivity
You cannot define what productivity is, though.

>> No.20471234 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20471234

>>20471220
>because jobs are available and you need to survive.
Gods commandments are available too, and you do need rain for crops to grow.

>I have no idea what's the point of that wall of text you posted.
Sorry, I mistook you for someone having a 3-digit IQ number.

Let me paraphrase it for imbeciles: things such as "production", "value", etc. would have required a shitton of unmeasurable factors to measure. As such, Marxian framework is false.

>> No.18891518 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18891518

>>18891190
1. Ha-Joon Chang - Economics: The User's Guide
2. Steve Keen - Debunking Economics
3. Tim Di Muzio - An Anthropology of Money: A Critical Introduction
4. Nitzan and Bichler - Capital as Power
5. Tim Di Muzio - Debt as Power
6. Blair Fix - Rethinking Economic Growth Theory From a Biophysical Perspective
7. https://economicsfromthetopdown.com/2020/09/04/stocks-are-up-wages-are-down-what-does-it-mean/ - (and other articles here)

>> No.18545714 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18545714

>>18545673
>There is only commodity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggregation_problem

There is no such thing as "commodity" >>18543999
The Cambridge Controversy devastates both mainstream AND marxist economical theories. You cannot assign a single objective value to a fucking commodity. Therefore, any calculations you make are akin to astrology (and astrology is VERY math-heavy, btw)

>> No.17770663 [View]
File: 42 KB, 819x431, Fix B. - Rethinking economic growth theory (1) (2015).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17770663

>>17769537
>They see the world in terms of modes of production
Which is retarded

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]