/lit/ - Literature

>>18607689
>be me
>glorious conqueror and destroyer of christcuckery
>see before me a monument to the desert tale cross, a church/monastary
>after looting and setting everything on fire i line up the judeo-christian value practioning believers in a row
>have my companions use hammers to pulverize the testicles of those who believe in desert tales
>cut them loose and let them roam the earth as eunuchs who not only suffer greatly in this plane, but also are in full belief that they will not reach the kingdom of heaven
Nothing personnel.

>>18363150
>see a thread on author
>read the posts of those that have read that author or their wiki page
>go out into the world and talk about the authors ideas without ever having read him
I toss in a lot of lies to make the facts my own, everyone thinks I'm a smart guy

>>18112333
I genuinely believe I like little girls/boys because of /lit/.

Is Hell real? Using what you've read on the subject, how do you justify your belief?

>>17071569
The line going through the o’s really do make it look that way

>>16967760
>smug pepe
>hateful
You have to be VERY sensitive to believe this. He's just having fun bro. The cringe fat /pol/ toad is the hateful one.

>>14239783
Every Christian post is by default about literature

>>14223264
Rory Williams (I think), “Meditations on Violence” is one of the best. Musashi’s book is not as much a meme as people say, it cuts to the heart of what violence is and when and how to execute it (mentally speaking).

>>14223409
> Hagakure
Based

>>13954762
>tfw this used to be you but then your narcissistic personality developed further and you became happy

>>13843903
my diary desu tbrqhwy family

Can someone tell me what's wrong with this "racism" thing? Who the fuck cares? It's the natural instinct of all Human beings to be partial to their own racial, ethnic and other familial extensions. He just didn't like non-white people, and even other white/European ethnicities that were displacing his Mayflower WASP founding stock. Gonna cry about it?

90% of the humanities majors in my school are complete brainlets, and that's a conservative estimate. True Chad's study STEM and are still well-read.

>From this short review it will be easy to distinguish between that class of natural rights which man retains after entering into society and those which he throws into the common stock as a member of society.
>The natural rights which he retains are all those in which the Power to execute is as perfect in the individual as the right itself. Among this class, as is before mentioned, are all the intellectual rights, or rights of the mind; consequently religion is one of those rights.
>The natural rights which are not retained, are all those in which, though the right is perfect in the individual, the power to execute them is defective. They answer not his purpose. A man, by natural right, has a right to judge in his own cause; and so far as the right of the mind is concerned, he never surrenders it. But what availeth it him to judge, if he has not power to redress? He therefore deposits this right in the common stock of society, and takes the ann of society, of which he is a part, in preference and in addition to his own. Society grants him nothing. Every man is a proprietor in society, and draws on the capital as a matter of right.

Mainly this part - "though the right is perfect in the individual, the power to execute them is defective. They answer not his purpose."

Doesn't every "natural right" become defective once it enters into society?