/lit/ - Literature

>>15035077
>he thinks I feel trigger by their "research"
No, I feel triggered by the normies who are going to swallow this pseudoscience like it's truth.

But what triggers me the most is how these "scientists" think they are entitled to give us moral lessons from their observations.

Scientists should be locked in cages like monkeys and crank out data and not be allowed write a single subjective line on their observations.

>>14188508
>Atheism is brain damage
True.

>>14100772
>Most young people in Europe that aren't shitskins don't give two fucks about religion.
It's almost like there's a correlation...?

I just watched a PhD-holding physicist state that because we can "turn off" morality with magnets, there is no objective morality. He also declared that every aspect of our existence is explicable by some evolutionary mechanism.

My question is: what is the proper response to this?

Is he wrong? If so, how?