/lit/ - Literature

>>6206120
Yes but Nietzsche wants you to know it is you who retains these ideas out of a sense of nobility when the de facto hierarchy, what since antiquity has been 'honest' and realistic', is a continuum of authority from the bottom rungs to the top. Your notions toward gender is cultivated from the Enlightenment.

>>6166833
Then I must be missing a nuanced point in your post, if you don't care for Truth (or God, or objectivity, in that sense) you *can* arbitrate what is truth and what isn't, in a sense, you arbitrate your collection of personal truths.

>>6166282
Devaluation in the sense of moving beyond, like his urge to move beyond Christanity's conception of good and evil. N has been unreservedly open about the biases and subjectivity of his own position, he admits Zarathustra is written for everyone yet no one, meaning it is accessible to the public, but it will really be accepted by a few who is infatuated with life as he.

He is able to speak against Platonists and those who quest for Truth because they are incapable of skepticism and humor, in a sense. Past philosophers up to Kant had a dogmatic conviction in the foundations of reality built by Plato, the enemy of truth is not falsehood, but convictions. Your precise request for a 'metric' is kind of the scientific thinking which arose out of natural philosophy. Nietzsche is not questing for truths, he intents to convey a new way of perceiving & interpreting.