/lit/ - Literature

>>19823339
>Whitman is one of the only poets to ever exist in human history.

>>19817498
It's not a paradigm. It's just a convenient shorthand to compare political actors in terms of beliefs/ideology. No one with even half a brain sees it as anything more than that.

>>16644921
one is bigger than zero

>Right handily winning

Christ, ever since Moot or whomever brought back /pol/, this place has gone to shit. Guarantee these rightoids are responsible for 99% of the shitposting pseuds in /lit/. Same goes for every other board on this website as well.

Where to migrate to bros? /leftypol/ is too dead for good lit discussion.

>an herb

>an herb

how do i write without wanting to kill myself after every sentence? drunk writing?

>>13531178
>>13531187
What are you on about?

>>13362856
>>13362930
>>13362908

>>13326530

Last time there was a thread about this someone posted a video debunking Taleb's points about IQ. The video said IQ in fact does have a positive relationship with income and net worth and that the paper Taleb cites shows that. But what I never got about that video is that, even if the median IQ does relate to the median net worth, does that really prove Taleb wrong? Is the median really that useful if the variation is as wide as the paper also says? It seems to me like the guy in the video made a mistake, or am I wrong? Please explain to this confused anon

hey /LIT/,
I read too much history and I want to start reading more novels.
What would be some good starters (I want them to be good as books aswell) for me?

>>13270736
The second chart shows a positive relationship, so why does the scatter plot show almost no relationship beyond 50k~ ? Is it just that there are way more people in the bottom left and so it sort of tricks the eye? I don't get it.

>>12463689