/lit/ - Literature

How are animals supposed to increase their karma? Is a carnivore animal supposed to go like "nah I'm not eating today" until it accumulates good enough karma to be reborn as a human or whatever? Are herbivore animals inherently superior to carnivores for example, as they don't kill for food? In fact, herbivores seem to be almost perfect as far as morality goes, even better than humans.
I find myself with the metaphysics of this religion but the moral part feels shoehorned, or "Upaya" for simple people who don't know better. Also, these questions might apply to other dharmic religions as well, but I'm not familiar enough.

LMAO bloodmouths are pathetic
>I am literally a lion you guys
Man STFU

>>15182075
Post hot monks

>>12516171
>Hinduism has more testosterone and already provides everything good that Buddhism does.

No. Buddhism has more T.

>>11484864
There is a truth to what you're saying but you take it way too far. First of all there are very few perfect beautiful and successful people in the world, those that do exist have no need for ideologies because their lives are already perfect, that is until something tragic happens to them and they have no mechanism for coping with it because they never had a bad experience in their whole life.

joke: drug use, promiscuity, nightlife
woke: straight edge, celibacy, up before dawn to exercise