/lit/ - Literature

>>14730987
>I accept Robinson's refutation of Nagarjuna's logic because that is a field he specialized in and hence was qualified to comment on........Robinson is out of his depth there
that isn't actually what he 'specializes' in, he just wrote a 7 page piece regarding the method of refutation Madhyamika (and subsequent schools). He specializes in early Indian philosophy (and Chinese philosophy) and has written about Shankara too (pic related) which suggests that he was well familiar with his work. So you're suggestion that he's out of depth in some areas simply does not hold.

You are just cherry picking sections of sources that suit you.