/lit/ - Literature

>Ideology, science, art and the rest, through the entire range of institutions and organizations act together to instill the belief that human beings are inessential and powerless to act. [21] More than this, they all enforce the idea that if we seem to have arrived at a particular stage of social evolution, it is because it could not have been otherwise from the very beginning when we first appropriated and developed technology. There is a certain fatality which surrounds technology: if we do not embrace it, we cannot progress. All we can do is remedy certain shortcomings, but we cannot escape the workings of the machine, which is this society itself. The trap has been closed, people have been immobilized, and the determining factor here is the representation of capital - it represents itself (i.e. capital) as a rational social process, which gives rise to the feeling that the system can no longer be perceived as oppressive. In order to explain any negative aspects, capital simply invokes categories designated as "outside of capital".

>The long habit of mind which has allowed human intelligence to be a host for the parasitical representation of capital has to be broken down. The mentality and behaviour of the servant (whose master is capital) must be eradicated. This need is now all the more urgent as the old dialectic of master and slave is tending to disappear in the process whereby even the slave - the human being - is becoming redundant.

Thanks to the jannies who deleted thread when I had the perfect reply.

>>/lit/thread/16149759
>>16149759
Eternal reminder.
Read Camatte or be subsumed by twitter's technical reorganisation through vaccine romanticism.

>>13917298
>let's just recuperate any opposing ideologies into a subracket
Thanks for proving this correct.

>>13869493
>Accelerationism is formalisation of the racket. Critique is subsumed by its own theory devalorised into production, and so the transitional marxist organisation must identify with the very recuperation process it had set out to abolish.

lun/acc is the only acceptable response.
Acc is the formalisation of racket thinking.

>>13668550
Nope.

>>13626658
>Capital will be forced to return into humanity

>Is there anything he can't do?
git gud

>>13359742
>dood just rebel against society by accepting it lmao

>>13281037
Based.

>>13186575
This isn't difficult.

>>12732686
Exactly.

>>12643126
>an accelerationist stuck in 1985 memeworld telling anyone to speed up
Still waiting for an answer.

>>12514736
Basically true though. Most of the ideas are just stolen from the ultra-left, but the lack of depth is replaced with hipster academic concepts.

>>12494758
If you're going to fall for this meme at least read the original. Beware the rackets.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/camatte/wanhum/wanhum01.htm

>>12489248
Accelerationists haven't read Marx.
And they'll never be able to meme.

>>12308657
A word, please

>>12308507
So you've just replaced 'valorisation' with 'sentience' in an effort to make the opposition to capital more saleable and hip. I.e. you have revalorised your own opposition to capital as its theoretical sentience, and are thus acting as an object of deceleration and living labour replacing its dead circuits.
Someone would like to have a word with you...

>>12256053
Soft Marxist academics who were 50 years behind Camatte.

>>12256646

>>11896978