/lit/ - Literature

>>22812647
so you've taken the rational final step, correct?

>last post over a month ago
Did the glowies finally get him? Or was it antifa? Or his insane-ass ex?

>Entire work is just a dumbed down version of Frankfurt School's critique of ideological structures
Heh, nothing personnel kid

I kind of get where he's coming from, but he needs a severe dose of neurotypicality. And to think, this is after he's been getting laid on a regular basis. I can't imagine how much worse he was before he made any money off his writings:

https://graymirror.substack.com/p/three-questions-for-richard-hanania

That said, he is right in a weird, hopelessly autistic way about the uselessness of liberalism for most societies. The degree to which it's enabled everything from revolutionary socialism to kleptocratic kakistocracy really drives a stake into the heart of ever using it on an underdeveloped society.

>comes out as a supporter of the Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship

Thoughts? Is he right?

Have any of you read his new essay about hobbits and elves?

Elves were Jews. Trust me.

This nigga thinks he is an elf—with that chin.

https://graymirror.substack.com/p/you-can-only-lose-the-culture-war

So no one going to mention moldbug?

I'm reading UR right now. This man is extremely intelligent but he's also dangerously autistic. Like he's so autistic it's not even funny.

>I'm kinda neutral on him. I think he is kinda overrated and Peter Thiel is shilling him so Peter Thiel thought it was a good idea for everybody to hear Moldbug and now he is making the rounds. But I am sorta neutral. WOAH! Elites exist?! *explosion* What's the groundbreaking take? Y'know. *sips* I watch his Tucker interview, and I'm like "So what, ni**a?" Everything you are telling me I know. And it's hard to listen to him talk. Hate to be the one to say that, but he talks - bad. (laughter) So, he's interesting, I mean he's interesting. I listen to some of his stuff. I'm sort of neutral on him. He's overrated I think. And he won't talk about jewish power either.
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1644339058763.webm

I have found out through many debates that most people who disagree with him haven't even read his work

What do we think about his latest post? Let's get some hot shitposts in before he enables comments.

can someone ELI5 Curtis Yarvin to me and the obsession around him? Out of nowhere, it seems like people who liked Jordan Peterson are now obsessed with this guy.

Is he paying randos to go out on the internet and shill his blog or something?

Is this guy, or any of the other neoractionaries really, worth reading?

>Nonono, it's YOU who's not clearpilled

Can't believe I am subscribed to this fraud.

I look like curtis yarvin, same hair too, am I ugly bros?

>Obedience good.
>China good.
>Effective Altruism bad

Uhh I don't know about this bros, sounds like a bit of a chud to me

>writes poetry
>reads his own poetry at public events
>has been doing so since his 20s
>there's video evidence of this fact
Yet the jannies still delete his threads. WHY

>It's just regular history explained with software metaphors
What a fucking hack

>>19060830
>Jacobin

So which of his works should I start with? The Tucker interview got me curious, but I'd rather read than watch/listen if I can because I don't want to feed my ADHD.
Also please don't start a fucking political shitflinging thing, I just want to know what he wrote bros.

Why is there no paperback versions of his work?