/lit/ - Literature

>35 minutes
Yikes!

>>11806073
>First actually read some and even if you still think that it doesn't outweigh the fact that it remains the best approach to dealing with some of the most fundamental categories of philosophical problems.

I’ve read it anon. It’s soulless. It’s pedantic. It’s useless. Analytic philosophy is philosophy pretending to be math and science.

>>11795426
cont.

basically this

>analytical philosophy actually giving any personal value to anyone at all

>>10307947
>Not an argument
It's not a matter of arguing. You are trying to question the oldest and greatest artistic medium and admit to not being able to understand it on a fundamental level. This makes you a fool, that's all there needs to be said. Hopefully for your own sake you are young enough to grow into, because this is a kind of ignorance that can only be afforded to children

There is nothing wrong with analytic philosophy, its just another field like what maths is to art.