/lit/ - Literature

>>23298517
>>23298582
>>23298629

>book switches to entirely new characters 2/3 of the way through
>by the time you're invested in the new cast the book is over

>literally never driven a car when I wasn't stoned

I want something like Dracula but where Dracula is a straight up monster and there are no women talking

The book is great until women start fuckin talking about their dates and their pussies

I hate women so much

Newfag here. Trying to make reading a habit. How much should I read before DNFing a book.

>it's time for kike fanfic
>again
Yikes

>>20798125
so you wont get over it, eh?

>History BA
declined an actually good PhD program, instead getting a professional masters of architecture degree. My family's businesses are in construction and contracting so I'll have a good segway into a decently lucrative career

and philosophags have killed it

>>19393691
>egg shells sticking to egg whites, tearing the egg apart when I try to peel it
I could be compelled to murder after a very short period of having to do this

i finally had sex and it was disappointing

>>18371505
exatcly, midwits

>>18195209
that's horrible anon, you're scum. Take a look at yourself and the kind of man you are.
>inb4 bait
I believe this faggot

>>18064267

>>18063819
heh,... th-the only book you n,need, is the... the guide on how to disconnect your internet! heh... uh..,. heh.... f-faggot

>>17055811
Reading is a skill of analysis and interpretation so it's hard if you read kinda without questioning the narrative and absorbs it as pure propaganda. At least that's how its like whenever I've tried to read and had problems understanding the text. I'm probably a disabled tard though

>>16741689
Common sense criticism of liberal individualistic values

>>16697986
>Who was horrendous, the first who brought forth swords

>>16574950
>roaring fire
>howling wind

>>16562325
>>16562334
They believe that there are two principles of the universe, the active and the passive. The passive, then, is unqualified substance, i.e., matter, whereas the active is the rational principle [logos] in it, i.e., god. For he, being eternal and [penetrating] all of matter, is the craftsman of all things. Zeno of Citium propounds this doctrine in his On Substance, Cleanthes in his On Atoms, Chrysippus toward the end of book 1 of his Physics, Archedemus in his On Elements, and Posidonius in book 2 of his Account of Physics. They say that there is a difference between principles and elements. For the former are ungenerated and indestructible, whereas the elements are destroyed in the [universal] conflagration. And the principles are bodies and without form, whereas the elements are endowed with form.

>>16559638
but how do you know if its truly filler?

>>16495142
>Plato was a naturalist though

>>16390748
Ok...?

>>16375551
No other book ever written endures so much scrutiny. Unthinkable that God would speak to a man through a library of books in dialogue with each other. Your post is so mean-spirited as to be useless for dialogue. Please go somewhere else.