/lit/ - Literature

>>20723017
Topological

How many hours do you read per day ?
Per week?

>>17433094
Black is exhausted of legal moves so it must be white's turn. And for white to checkmate here, white has to maintain the status quo. So King to C7 it is.

>>16615502
Greece never existed. It was invented by the Romans.

Human suffering is good and we should strive to maximise it.

>>14851350
Academic essays, you know, garbage written by social science students that nobody will ever read or reference ever again after they have been written. How white privilege affects the mating rituals of gibbon monkeys or the why British colonial empire caused the death of Tupac and the like. It's the only thing I find amusing anymore.

>>14771625
>communism is right wing

Morals are revealed in the very process of discourse. In choosing to argue my case to you, I tacitly concede that other courses of action (murdering you, stealing from you, raping you, torturing you, etc.) are not worth pursuing.

>>13819976
because 1 - 1 is not 0, your body still remains, therefore suicide and death is mathematically impossible.

>tfw to smart to fit into any political or philosophical discourse group because I have 'invented' my own ideology that completely btfos everyone else in debate
lit for this feel?

>>13381937
Across all dimensions?
Furthering definiteness of competency across all potential social conflict & resolution systems. Picture multitude heaps of sand all increasing in volume and accumulating to become a tip of all heaps, that's the highest virtue (something like God). "The highest virtue is not virtuous, and that is why it's is virtuous.
I might sound like an incoherent idiot but I am trying to compress information.

>>13379683
It's an easy solution really: create a /rel/igion board and remove humanities from /his/ and make an /art/ board for humanities.

James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

I read is it this order
sneed
feed
fuck niggers

>>13273592
>dickensians
>kafkites
>pynchoneers
>beckettites
>pessomists
>orwellios
>huxleybies
>faulknerds

>this means something
HOTTEST TAKE

How to find almost any book for free unless you're esoteric af (in which case you wouldn't be asking)
>go to startpage.com
>look up '[book title] ebook download'
>open the web page that isn't obviously useless like amazon
>download book

>>12063758
Need good book references

>>12007081
but what he's saying is what he's doing

>mfw im both

>>11990439
What a nuanced opinion you have there.

If you truly desire to do something, you will do it. Otherwise, you will suffer mediocrity if you "try".

What big brain words do you like, /lit/?
>Pulchritudinous
Adjective referring to a person of inhuman beauty
>itt big brain vocabulary

Throw out:
>Mein Kampf
No argumentative content.

>Man, Economy, and Sate
Treats "the State" too transcendentally; Carl Schmitt's "the Concept of the Political" may help cure this way of thinking, or Stirner, if you're a pseud.

>George Orwell's works
Total garbage.

>Molymeme
He is the fucking king of the Dunning-Krueger effect; you'd do best not to learn from him.

>Protocols of Zion
If it was a verified document, I'd say read it, but it's a hoax, so don't.

>Evola
Occultist nonsense. Nietzsche is marginally better, but a lot of it is still nonsense.

Also
>Dawkins
Don't throw out, but be careful. His arguments against God/Christianity are good, but he is a secular humanist, which is often worse.

I strongly recommend adding James Burnham's "the Machiavellians" and "the Suicide of the West".