/lit/ - Literature

>>18968094
This, my brother. Oh do I wish to be initiated into the Amritic Stream of Pure Golden Bliss.

>>18861514
>I truly exist, because I, qua immediate pure consciousness, am the Atman-Brahman in my essential and true nature, like all beings

>>18718702
>>18718707
>>18718715
> They are like a fortune, a treasure

>Hinduism is where it's at. Anons cucking for Buddhism are low IQ morons.

>>15991120
common sense

>>15771900
>the real shit is Vedanta and Hindu Tantra
if by shit you mean faeces, then yes its very real

>>15444639
>this is lame, we should post based refutations of dualism and based refutations of multiplicity instead
>Mandana refutes difference by means of dialectical arguments. We do not perceive any ‘difference*. Three alternatives are possible regarding perception:
>(1) perception may manifest a positive object;
>(2) it may distinguish an object from other objects; and
>(3) it may manifest a positive object and may also distinguish it from other objects.
>In the third alternative again there are three possibilities: (a) manifestation of a positive object and its distinction from other objects may be simultaneous; (b) first there may be positive manifestation and then negative distinction; and (c) first there may be negative distinction and then positive manifestation. Now, in the first alternative where only a positive object is manifested, no ‘difference' is perceived. The second alternative is untenable because, pure negation is an impossibility. Perception always manifests some positive object; it does not negate anything.
>Hence perception cannot reveal mere difference. Possibilities (a) and (c) of the third alternative are untenable, for positive manifestation and negative distinction can be neither simultaneous
>nor can there be first negative distinction without positive manifestation. Negation is necessarily rooted in affirmation. Difference or distinction is a relation between two positive objects which it
>presupposes. Even the negation of a non-entity like the sky-flower is only a denial of the false relation between two positive entities, the sky and the flower. Possibility (b) of the third alternative is also untenable, for perception is one unique process and there cannot be two or more moments in it.

>>15430371
>this is what Hinduism's end goal looks like
filth

stop worshiping the devil, accept Jesus shitskin

>>15422434
Based. Is he now a priest in the Hinduistic system of worship?

>couldn't even figure out that praying to idols & demons was bad
lol.

>>15293252
>my point is that the fountain of knowledge is in the east
This... Brother... The East truly is the spiritual center wherein all metaphysics originates from as a steady warm stream of esoteric knowledge....

>>15241846
>I sure do love (((christianity))) and not the eons of esoteric mysticism of my ancestors

>I am become Pajeet, shitter of designated streets

>>15162452
>>15162464
>>15162461
based... so transcendant and sublime.... bros.... i am contemplating...

>>15126807
>Just read up on hinduism
cringe....

>here's your jivanmukti bro