/lit/ - Literature

>>12859447
You don't appear to know one thing about what you're posting.
There are many schemes in socialism, some of which, my favorites, involve no actual state. The government is the governed themselves. A truly socialist variety, you have to concede.

The communes where swallowed up by capitalists

>>12367645
He didn't work for it.

Does Owen count as /fa/?

>>11004499
I tend to float around Social Democracy, Communism, and Utopianism so i don't know if my opinion holds for general Communists.
Communism has given us many privileges we enjoy today, some through government reforms, some through strikes, some through more radical actions. Things like a maximum of 8 hours a day (with overtime paid extra if one choses), no children working in factories and dangerous environments, minimum wages, etc, to name a few. It was once a radical idea that kids should not risk their health in a workplace and should instead go to school and learn to become what they want to be and this was opposed by the oligarchs in the world. Communism itself never wanted to take away your toothbrush and your computer only it wants to take away the wealth made by labour from individuals and instead allow said wealth to go to the wages, healthcare, infrastructure, etc.

A lot more can be said but i don't want to bore you.

>>10852113
*blocks your path*