/lit/ - Literature

>>18540514
>How do you know which God tho
Because I believe Christianity has the fullness of truth. Other religions might have ounces of truth in there, Neoplatonism has some, perhaps Islam has some, but I think the fullness of truth comes from God becoming flesh and meeting with his creation. I also think that the historicity of the gospels, the resurrection, the prophecies from the old and the new all point to the Christian truth.

>Resurrection - has anyone ever actually done this on purely rational grounds?
Yes

>>17107029
I don't think op is a capitalist conservative that Kaczynski was talking about.

>>17106994
If you are looking for arguments for Christianity being the true religion you should read The Summa Contra Gentiles by Aquinas.
Just because there are many religions doesn't mean Christianity is not the true religion. Just like there are many numbers there is only one answer for 2+2=4.

Also remember that it is almost impossible to have a conservative cultural society without religion as the cornerstone. Without a higher authority order cannot be achieved and liberalism will prevail through man's limited reason. Joseph de Maistre talks about this:

>“Nothing is more vital to him than prejudices. Let us not take this word in bad part. It does not necessarily signify false ideas, but only, in the strict sense of the word, any opinions adopted without examination. Now, these kinds of opinion are essential to man; they are the real basis of his happiness and the palladium of empires. Without them, there can be neither religion, morality, nor government. There should be a state religion just as there is a state political system; or rather, religion and political dogmas, mingled and merged together, should together form a general or national mind sufficiently strong to repress the aberrations of the individual reason which is, of its nature, the mortal enemy of any association whatever because it gives birth only to divergent opinions.”

>>17087614
Our father

>>17068648
I'm not a larper. Larpers never heard of The Dialogue, must less read it.

>>17037791
>>17035960
This.
There's a lot of evidence pointing towards Jesus' resurrection.

>>16481132
>Well, yes? What is it trying to say?

Remember your last end.

There are no pockets in a shroud.