/lit/ - Literature

>some infinities are bigger than others
What did he mean by this?

>Bum shafting shattered my whopper

>>17309967
"Some infinities are bigger than others". I hope one is big enough to fit into my whopper, which has been shattered by bum-shafting.

>As he read, I fell in love the way you fall asleep: slowly, and then all at once.
>Some infinities are bigger than other infinities.
>The marks humans leave are too often scars
>Thomas Edison's last words were "It's very beautiful over there". I don't know where there is, but I believe it's somewhere, and I hope it's beautiful
>Maybe 'Okay' will be our 'always'...
What kind of pond scum reads this and feels moved?

Who's the most basedboy author?

READ JOHN GREEN

He was drizzle and she was a hurricane.

>think it's first day of classes today
>turns out it's wednesday

>>13791083
lmao

>not looking for anything serious just looking for a stud to put his dick in my cheerios! :)

What did John Green mean by this?

The most punchable face in the game.

>the s()ymale of amerikwa

And people thought John Green was bad

>>10735772
what about my man John?

>>10211324
>designating certain foods for breakfast exclusivity

Is he, dare I say it, /ourguy/?

>How did scrambled eggs get stuck with breakfast exclusivity? You can put bacon on a sandwich without anyone freaking out. But the moment your sandwich has an egg, boom, it's a breakfast sandwich.

You guys excited for Turtles All The Way Down?

>With the single exception of Homer, there is no eminent writer, not even Sir Walter Scott, whom I can despise so entirely as I despise Shakespeare when I measure my mind against his.

Is he, dare I say it, /ourguy/?

>But in all this we have been overlooking an essential distinction that obtains among the objects, that is, among those concepts of understanding which reason endeavours to raise
to ideas. According to the table of categories given above, two of these concepts imply a mathematical, the other two a dynamical synthesis of appearances. Hitherto it has not been necessary to take account of this distinction; for just as in the general representation of all transcendental ideas we have been conforming to conditions within the [field of] appearance, so in the two mathematical-transcendental ideas the only object we have had in mind is object as appearance. But now
that we are proceeding to consider how far dynamical concepts of the understanding are adequate to the idea of reason, the distinction becomes of importance, and opens up to us an
entirely new view of the suit in which reason is implicated.

-John Green

Do you have to be a narcissist in order to write?