/lit/ - Literature

>>12699574
He didn't mention race. You're either baiting or retarded. Either way I advise all other anons to not engage.

>>11724287
That's not his argument for Absolutism nor is it his argument for the Transcendental.
He has quite a few arguments for each of those concepts including a purely Material economic argument for Absolutism. In short, under Absolutism a Sovereign is incentived to treat the State as their property and thus defend and nurture it; compare that to a Liberal Republic where the politicians are incentized to treat the State as a tool that can be abused or even dismembered in order to increase their private property, and you see that - in the long run - Absolutism creates a more stable and prosperous society. This is a real oversimplification of one of his arguments but it's a lot better than your blatant misrepresentation.

>>11090205
First, how do you define "worked" because I already said how it worked here >>11089135 . You just keep repeating yourself.

But that's not even the point you brainwashed little mongoloid. You're not interested in having an actual discussion on the historical facts surrounding any of these societies. You're such a utopian ideologue that you can't even concede obvious flaws in your argument like "[insert communist country] was poor before communism". All you can do is repeat the same stale memes because either you're an extremely dishonest orator or that's literally the only framework you can see the world in.
I'm not responding to you anymore except to call you a faggot.

>>10354172
You could also use one of those links as a source and post your link: www.FaggotQuarterly.cock/how-to-be-a-massive-faggot/
And then say something along the lines of "And here in this article it says how I am being a massive Faggot"