/lit/ - Literature

This is an exhaustive list of all philosophers you should ever bother with. If a philosopher is not on this list he/she's most likely not worthy of your time
>Heraclitus (pbuh)
>Protagoras (pbuh)
>Thrasymachus (pbuh)
>William of Ockham (pbuh)
>Spinoza (pbuh)
>de Montaigne (pbuh)
>Machiavelli (pbuh)
>Hume (pbuh)
>Kant (pbuh)
>Feuerbach (pbuh)
>Stirner (pbuh)
>F. A. Lange (pbuh)
>Nietzsche (pbuh)
>Ragnar Redbeard (pbuh)
>H. L. Mencken (pbuh)
>Bergson (pbuh)
>Poincare (pbuh)
>Foucault (pbuh)
>Deleuze (pbuh)
>Baudrillard (pbuh)
>Lyotard (pbuh)
>Osho (pbuh)
>Sloterdijk (pbuh)
>Nick Land (pbuh)

>>16411188
BASED BASED BASED BARUCH SPINOZA (PBUH) REFUTED CRINGE CHRISTKEKS KIKES AND HYLLICS BASED

Just finished Ethics by Spinoza (pbuh), more books on pantheism?

>>16121363
Extremely based and order-of-connection-pilled

Ok, I’LL start

>BTFO christkikes and jews so much they can only throw at you random verses without refuting his philosophy
SEETHING HYLICS... BARUCH SPINOZA (PBUH) CAN NOT BE REFUTED.....

Based spinozist
Remember fags, the order and connection of my cock is the same as the order and connection of your mom’s orgasm

What is the best edition to read the entirety of his works in?
Preferably in English, I can read Latin but not well enough that I’d want to read hundreds of pages of someone with a writing style as autistic as Spinoza.
Can anybody tell me what they think his most key works (besides Ethica) are?

>>15108098
>tfw the order and connection of ideas is physically demonstrated to be the basis for the order and connection of things

>>15105129
>the order and connection of 4channel is the same as the order and connection of reddit

>>15028044
Extremely based
>>15028072
> So your god is the unconscious universe itself.
God is the concepts and laws that govern the nature and processes of reality and the universe not the universe itself.
>Mother nature.
You can’t help but be extremely cringe and normalfag can you mothnig? You must be baiting to ascribe human properties like sex to the kind of God being described in this situation.

>>14999636
Because he was against the idea of a personal God, not that he was an atheist and atheists claiming Spinoza are very stupid, after all his writing against a personal God hinged on the fact that he demonstrated the existence of his abstract form of God. He completely BTFO Jewish and Christian theology of the time and they still can’t help but seethe

>tfw you get picked for the spine over Descartes

>why yes, this is my favourite thread on /lit/ right now, how could you tell?

>actually proves that God exists
>>14552796
So you’ll watch pseudo intellectuals make pop-philosophy videos rather than actually read? I fucking hate faggots like you, this is only a board for discussing philosophy if you have books to discuss you absolute troglodyte. Do any of you cunts fucking read?

The order and connection of my dick is the same as the order and connection of your mom’s orgasm