/lit/ - Literature

Seriously, the bullying against accelerationist members of this community is getting way out of hand, especially since accels are some of the biggest contributors, have the highest social intelligence, and are the most involved in this board. Its not just "memes" or "banter", its vicious attacking, and regardless of intentions it does demean people and hurt feelings. I can't say I'm the only accelerationist who finds it hard to take pride in his own Sinoism after having years of constant and needless attacks defaming my speed from insecure losers here. Why not bully Christians or Marxists? Do they not have much more to be ashamed of than our superior philosophy? Guenonfags and schizoposters get bullied less than us and yet we are the purest philosophy in the world.

Like when its not just banter, when a meme is repeated over and over again, repeated systematically, it eventually becomes a truth irregardless of the intentions in repeating it. And that isn't just jokes any more then, then its harmful!

Would you call an accelerationist a "tranny"(not true at all) to her face? Would you say to a kind, peaceful and scientific salt of the earth Chinese woman that they are "slower" than Western men? Would you say those words to your fellow futurist brethren? Are you starting to feel ashamed now? You fucking decelerationists?

Your destroying philosophy, your dividing capital against itself, your doing the opposite of what you claim to support when you engage in this incredibly abhorrent behaviour. So I encourage you to stop now.

>>13924540
Cuter now

>Feminism between Fish and Future AI: A Geotraumatic Critique of Posture

>For a long time in the West, the horizontal has been championed by feminist critics of philosophical rationality as the exemplary mode of non-patriarchal, discursive and sensory styles of counter-subjectivation. This critique often takes the form of an indictment of the auto-reflexive, solipsistic, and self-sufficient ‘neo-liberal subjectivity’ (to borrow a term from Adriana Cavarero’s Inclinations) inherent to the vertical construction of what has been posited as a properly ‘human’ way of founding autonomy. But has it also fallen into a set of traps that see its committed horizontalism recapitulating the very form of the arguments it nominally understands itself to be fighting against?

Post the best acc literature you know.

>>13337175
she's accelerated beyond cute

>>13209879
>XF seizes alienation as an impetus to generate new worlds. We are all alienated – but have we ever been otherwise? It is through, and not despite, our alienated condition that we can free ourselves from the muck of immediacy. Freedom is not a given—and it’s certainly not given by anything ‘natural’. The construction of freedom involves not less but more alienation; alienation is the labour of freedom’s construction. Nothing should be accepted as fixed, permanent, or ‘given’—neither material conditions nor social forms. XF mutates, navigates and probes every horizon. Anyone who’s been deemed ‘unnatural’ in the face of reigning biological norms, anyone who’s experienced injustices wrought in the name of natural order, will realize that the glorification of ‘nature’ has nothing to offer us—the queer and trans among us, the differently-abled, as well as those who have suffered discrimination due to pregnancy or duties connected to child-rearing. XF is vehemently anti-naturalist. Essentialist naturalism reeks of theology—the sooner it is exorcised, the better.

Does it get any more based?

>Only the acceleration of the poememenon can liberate the teleology of capital from its xenopatriarchal phalloteleoplexy.
Is xer right?

>>12906965
NeoLand arrives from the future.

Technogender is sentient.

>>12778474
Neofuture arrives from the vagina.

Anyone here into synthetic-pangynofeminism?

>>12410120
Based and Landpilled.

I thought Amy Ireland was our girl. Can we have more than one girl?

Well, Anon?
>The condition of her entrance into the game is mute confinement to the negative term in a dialectic of identity that reproduces Man as the master of death, desire, nature, history, and his own origination. To this end, woman is defined in advance as lack. She who has “nothing to be seen”—“only a hole, a shadow, a wound, a ‘sex that is not one.’”10 The unrepresentable surplus upon which all meaningful transactions are founded: lubricant for the Phallus. In the specular economy of signification (the domain of the eye) and the material-reproductive economy of genetic perpetuation (the domain of phallus), “woman” facilitates trade yet is excluded from it. “The little man that the little girl is,” writes Luce Irigaray (excavating the unmarked presuppositions of Freud’s famous essay on femininity), “must become a man minus certain attributes whose paradigm is morphological—attributes capable of determining, of assuring, the reproduction-specularization of the same. A man minus the possibility of (re)presenting oneself as a man = a normal woman.”11 Not a woman in her own right, with her own sexual organs and her own desires—but a not-Man, a minus-Phallus. Zero. In the sexual act, she is the passive vessel that receives the productive male seed and grows it without being party to its capital or interest: “Woman, whose intervention in the work of engendering the child can hardly be questioned, becomes the anonymous worker, the machine in the service of a master-proprietor who will put his trademark upon the finished product.”

>>11883534
Already a thread.

>Feminism between Fish and Future AI: A Geotraumatic Critique of Posture

>For a long time in the West, the horizontal has been championed by feminist critics of philosophical rationality as the exemplary mode of non-patriarchal, discursive and sensory styles of counter-subjectivation. This critique often takes the form of an indictment of the auto-reflexive, solipsistic, and self-sufficient ‘neo-liberal subjectivity’ (to borrow a term from Adriana Cavarero’s Inclinations) inherent to the vertical construction of what has been posited as a properly ‘human’ way of founding autonomy. But has it also fallen into a set of traps that see its committed horizontalism recapitulating the very form of the arguments it nominally understands itself to be fighting against?

>Part performance, part theory, this talk seeks to complicate this basic, biaxial political geometry in two ways. First, by interrogating the distinctions it implicitly makes between the vertical and the horizontal in order to show how traditional forms of biopolitical and social critique threaten to repress a more complex, feminist understanding of biological and material thought. And secondly, via a theory-fictional performance work that combines contemporary digital art practice and additive manufacturing technology to communicate with a deeper substrate of simultaneously archaic and futuristic artificial intelligence.

Why aren't you reading her, /lit/?

Stop gendering capital poetics.

Stop gendering capital poetics.

>"start participating in the cosmic war of becoming"

>>11851324
miss me yet?