/lit/ - Literature

>>21251913
sneed

>>20792464
So, you're buying me thousands of dollars worth in books AND I don't have to do the dishes anymore, cook, pay rent, work, look for a girlfriend???
I dunno dude seems like an improvement to me. When I graduate prison with this I'll go straight to the US or Japan and assume a teaching position for ten grand a month given that I'll be the only person on this planet to have read and understood in ten years Heidegger.

Write it up as a dirty slash fiction for female philosophy professors to jill off to.

>>20016827

>>18188282

>>17996948
Heidegger
thats all you need really anon

>>17129386
It was obviously Heidegger who managed to think jenseits of Nietzsche. But anyone worth reading from the 20th century borrows from Nietzsche and Heidegger to roughly equal degrees and it can be hard to see where one ends and another begins at times. Karatani's Origins of Modern Japanese Literature, for example, is Heideggerian in its method but invokes Nietzsche's 'search for hidden origins' as its goal.

>>16445860
Sure, https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviewers-guidelines/
I’m off to bed anon, hope I’ve been able to help. Heidegger’s a tough nut to crack but very much worth it, consider looking at Derrida’s lectures on Being and Time too. Him and Heidegger were good pals.

>>16325718
If you accept your finitude and are resolutely bad and selfish then you will not be unhappy OP

>>16134145
Updated version.

>>13240678
macq & rob is the overwhelming consensus form everything I've seen online. although i can't provide a basis to my answer, Hubert Dreyfus (renowned Heidegger academic) uses M&R for his course on B&T

This is why most of my socializing is done alone at shows/bars were I can get drunk and constantly stimulated by talking to a variety of people. This also increases the likelyhood of finding people with similar interests. Lately, I've been getting very discouraged since that last part has only happened maybe 1-2 times and neither time has resulted in a longer lasting relationship ( which is largely my fault).

lol

>>12117459
He is a french existentialist (meme philosophy for overgrown teenagers) meme philosopher that takes absolutely no intellectual ability to read. You can read his books quickly and once and get everything out of it. Most basedmen hear about him from either Wisrcrack or Chapo Traphouse (low-midwit bugman central).
He tries to tell people to have a gentle indifference to life and society and to embrace what he see as their "absurd" nature, which appeals to consumers because they want to feel as if they are different and anything less than worthless. His books are really to be consumed and not lived by. Many people who skim them are just living vicariously through their characters to feel like their favourite nihilist main character from x tv show.
Existentialism is for closet homo-sexuals (read Satre's reaction to the Nazis marching through Paris) who want to feel big brained but don't want to impose any obligations on themselves that would curb their staple of weed, "philosophy of Rick and Morty" videos and Blacked.com. Fact is you, me and everyone was brought into this world and your indentity produced because of, and to serve positive infinite returns (evolution, Capitalism etc. etc.). If you actually want to free yourself assert your will over the world, even if it is to no end at all.
Sorry I'm drunk that went a bit off track lmao

>>11820434
if she buys all the shit she ruined with her meme accessory then there is absolutely no problem

How do I get into reading this guy?

>>11122355

If it's any help, I learned all I know about Heidegger from this picture.