/lit/ - Literature

>>15818570
No, they are real Christians. They're just not good Christians, hence them being "poor representatives of Christianity." Jesus Christ would be the best representative.

>>15818589
The Vatican, you mean. Otherwise, all human institutions have been rotten to the core, be they pagan, scientific, or whatever is your holiest of holies. Next.

>>15818592
>the Jews of the past are the same as the Jews of today that white nationalists are fighting against

>>15818615
If you don't have a high moral standard, you won't achieve anything in life. Better to aim for the stars and fail.

>and consistently fail to meet their own standards
Yes, so they need God even more, because they are unable to follow His laws. It's simple, really. Are you able to consistently meet your own standards? In what belief or religion do you even partake? Do you even have a belief? It's easy to hold others to their own standards (and you are wrong, Christians DO hold themselves to their own standards) when you have no standards of your own, or when your standards are so easy to meet that you are the moral equivalent of a weakling.

>>15818621
LMAO
No, my point was that he misunderstood God's will. Besides, how can I know that He's unknown and permanent? Why does Him being so mean that He cannot change His will? You're falling into the same trap, just like that anon

>>15818622
Who are the people that say these things? The Christians in whose stead you are speaking? Brilliant.

>>15818840
Prove that they had interests. Excluding the Apocryphal texts has nothing to do with "creating a narrative" in the way you think.

>>15818871
>worship a Jew
God is not a human. Jesus Christ only incarnated Himself, but you keep fixating on the fact that He was some ancient Jew so you can equivocate Him with the Jews you hate of today, most of which are atheists and Ashkenazi.

>pilpul and hair splitting sectarianism
We don't have that tradition

>>15818930
Generalize, won't you?

>>15817505